<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.17811/ebl.7.3.2018.92-97</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Gimenez-Nadal, José Ignacio</dc:creator><dc:title>The substitution effect from the profit function in consumption: Expressions from the marshallian, hicksian, and frischian demand functions</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2018-109610</dc:identifier><dc:description>In the context of the optimizing behaviour assumption of individuals (Becker, 1976), three types of demand functions appear: Marshallian, Hicksian, and Frischian functions (Sproule, 2013). The Substitution Effect (SE) is a relevant concept, with our short paper developing two alternative theoretical expressions, specifically focusing on the Profit Function in Consumption and the Frischian functions. I address the fact that these demand functions with constant marginal utility of income play a very relevant role in the inter-temporal context.</dc:description><dc:date>2018</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/76997</dc:source><dc:doi>10.17811/ebl.7.3.2018.92-97</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/76997</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:76997</dc:identifier><dc:identifier.citation>Economics and business letters 7, 3 (2018), 92-97</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>by</dc:rights><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>