<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.1177/0950017017730528</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>García Mainar, Inmaculada</dc:creator><dc:creator>Montuenga Gómez, Victor Manuel</dc:creator><dc:creator>García Martín, Guillermo</dc:creator><dc:title>Occupational prestige and gender-occupational segregation</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2018-109193</dc:identifier><dc:description>The purpose of this article is to determine whether there is a relationship between the proportion of women working in an occupation and the prestige assigned to that occupation. Based on a representative sample of Spanish employees from the Spanish Quality of Working Life Survey, pooled-sample data (2007–2010) are used to show that occupations with larger shares of women present lower prestige, controlling for a set of objective individual and work-related variables, and self-assessed indicators of working conditions. However, the results obtained do not support the devaluation theory since an inverted-U relationship between female share and occupational prestige is observed. This conclusion holds even after passing a battery of robustness checks.</dc:description><dc:date>2018</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/77079</dc:source><dc:doi>10.1177/0950017017730528</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/77079</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:77079</dc:identifier><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA/S13</dc:relation><dc:identifier.citation>WORK EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIETY 32, 2 (2018), 348-367</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>All rights reserved</dc:rights><dc:rights>http://www.europeana.eu/rights/rr-f/</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>