000078008 001__ 78008
000078008 005__ 20240104111808.0
000078008 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1007/s00181-017-1351-1
000078008 0248_ $$2sideral$$a104193
000078008 037__ $$aART-2019-104193
000078008 041__ $$aeng
000078008 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-9111-0461$$aMancebón, M.J.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000078008 245__ $$aDoes the educational management model matter? New evidence from a quasiexperimental approach
000078008 260__ $$c2019
000078008 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000078008 5203_ $$aA growing literature has appeared in the last 2 decades with the aim to explore if the way in which publicly funded private schools are managed (a very autonomous mode) is more effective, than that applied in public schools (where decisions are highly centralized), concerning the promotion of student’s educational skills. Our paper contributes to this literature providing new evidence from the Spanish experience. To this end, we use the Spanish Assessment named “Evaluación de Diagnóstico, ” a national yearly standardized test given to students in the fourth grade and administered by the Regional Educational Authorities. In particular, our data are those corresponding to the assessment conducted in the Spanish region of Aragón in 2010. Our methodological strategy is defined by the sequential application of two methods: propensity score matching and hierarchical linear models. Additionally, the sensitivity of our estimates is also tested with respect to unobserved heterogeneity. Our results underline the existence of a slight advantage of the private management model of schools in the promotion of scientific abilities of students and in the acquisition of foreign language (English) skills.
000078008 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO/EDU2013-42480-R
000078008 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aAll rights reserved$$uhttp://www.europeana.eu/rights/rr-f/
000078008 590__ $$a1.308$$b2019
000078008 592__ $$a0.586$$b2019
000078008 591__ $$aSOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS$$b30 / 51 = 0.588$$c2019$$dQ3$$eT2
000078008 593__ $$aSocial Sciences (miscellaneous)$$c2019$$dQ1
000078008 591__ $$aECONOMICS$$b201 / 371 = 0.542$$c2019$$dQ3$$eT2
000078008 593__ $$aStatistics and Probability$$c2019$$dQ2
000078008 593__ $$aEconomics and Econometrics$$c2019$$dQ2
000078008 593__ $$aMathematics (miscellaneous)$$c2019$$dQ2
000078008 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
000078008 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0003-3337-217X$$aXiménez-de-Embún, D.P.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000078008 700__ $$aMediavilla, M.
000078008 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0003-3898-8889$$aGómez-Sancho, J.M.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000078008 7102_ $$14008$$2225$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Estruc.Hª Econ.y Eco.Pb.$$cÁrea Economía Aplicada
000078008 7102_ $$14000$$2415$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Análisis Económico$$cÁrea Fund. Análisis Económico
000078008 773__ $$g56, 1 (2019), 107-135$$pEmpir. econ.$$tEmpirical Economics$$x0377-7332
000078008 8564_ $$s517763$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/78008/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yPostprint
000078008 8564_ $$s1355860$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/78008/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yPostprint
000078008 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:78008$$particulos$$pdriver
000078008 951__ $$a2024-01-04-11:01:21
000078008 980__ $$aARTICLE