000078121 001__ 78121
000078121 005__ 20240126182118.0
000078121 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.03.006
000078121 0248_ $$2sideral$$a110865
000078121 037__ $$aART-2018-110865
000078121 041__ $$aeng
000078121 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0003-3074-5778$$aMuniesa, A.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000078121 245__ $$aEffectiveness of disinfectant treatments for inactivating Piscirickettsia salmonis
000078121 260__ $$c2018
000078121 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000078121 5203_ $$aThis short communication investigated in vitro differences between commercial disinfectants types (n = 36), doses of application, and time of action in the elimination of Piscirickettsia salmonis, the most important bacterium affecting farmed salmon in Chile. Seven different treatments were examined, including active and inactive chlorine dioxides, glutaraldehyde, hypochlorite disinfectants and detergents, peracetic acid, peroxides and other miscellaneous methods A 3 replicate set of each of the sample groups was stored at 20 °C and 95% relative humidity and retested after 1, 5 and 30 min with varying doses (low, recommended and high doses). Multiple comparison tests were performed for the mean log CFU/ml among different disinfectant types, dose (ppm) and time of exposure (minutes) on the reduction of P. salmonis. Overall, disinfection using peracetic acid, peroxides, and both active and inactive chlorine dioxides caused significantly higher reduction of >7.5 log CFU/ml in samples, compared to other tested sanitizers. The lowest reduction was obtained after disinfection with hypochlorite detergents. As expected, as doses and time of action increase, there was a significant reduction of the overall counts of P. salmonis. However, at lowest doses, only use of paracetic acids resulted in zero counts. Implementation of effective protocols, making use of adequate disinfectants, may enhance biosecurity, and ultimately, mitigate the impact of P. salmonis in farmed salmon.
000078121 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby-nc-nd$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
000078121 590__ $$a2.302$$b2018
000078121 591__ $$aVETERINARY SCIENCES$$b10 / 141 = 0.071$$c2018$$dQ1$$eT1
000078121 592__ $$a1.102$$b2018
000078121 593__ $$aFood Animals$$c2018$$dQ1
000078121 593__ $$aAnimal Science and Zoology$$c2018$$dQ1
000078121 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000078121 700__ $$aEscobar-Dodero, J.
000078121 700__ $$aSilva, N.
000078121 700__ $$aHenríquez, P.
000078121 700__ $$aBustos, P.
000078121 700__ $$aPerez, A.M.
000078121 700__ $$aMardones, F.O.
000078121 7102_ $$11009$$2773$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Patología Animal$$cÁrea Sanidad Animal
000078121 773__ $$g167 (2018), 196-201$$pPrev. vet. med.$$tPREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE$$x0167-5877
000078121 8564_ $$s545755$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/78121/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000078121 8564_ $$s2489190$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/78121/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000078121 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:78121$$particulos$$pdriver
000078121 951__ $$a2024-01-26-18:17:13
000078121 980__ $$aARTICLE