000078168 001__ 78168
000078168 005__ 20200716101437.0
000078168 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1371/journal.pone.0212000
000078168 0248_ $$2sideral$$a110914
000078168 037__ $$aART-2019-110914
000078168 041__ $$aeng
000078168 100__ $$aMayoral, A.P.
000078168 245__ $$aThe use of Barthel index for the assessment of the functional recovery after osteoporotic hip fracture: One year follow-up
000078168 260__ $$c2019
000078168 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000078168 5203_ $$aThe Barthel index evolution was analyzed in a sample of older people with osteoporotic hip fracture in order to verify the influence of comorbidities and cognitive impairment on the physical recovery of those patients, during the first year following the fracture. A prospective observational study was carried out between October 1, 2012 and March 31, 2013. A sample of 247 individuals was initially selected. After a primary revision, 39 participants were excluded (clearly not meeting inclusion criteria, lack of data, or not agree to participate in the study), and finally a total of 208 participants were included in the analysis, 166 women, with an average age of 84.59 years, and 42 men, with an average age of 82.05. 54.80% of all cases were older than 85 years. The mean Barthel index value prior to fracture was 76.63, decreasing to 64.91 at one-year follow-up. Only 22.12% of patients achieved a full recovery for activities of daily living. A statistical analysis was performed by comparing Barthel index recovery depending on the values of Charlson and Pfeiffer indexes, respectively. The mean differences in Barthel index drop between the one-year follow-up and the hospital admission values were found statistical significant (p<0.01). These findings indicate that Charlson and Pfeiffer indexes clearly influence the Barthel index recovery. Low values of Charlson and Pfeiffer indexes resulted in better Barthel index recovery. In conclusion, the Barthel index is a good tool to evaluate the physical recovery after osteoporotic hip fracture.
000078168 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
000078168 590__ $$a2.74$$b2019
000078168 592__ $$a1.023$$b2019
000078168 591__ $$aMULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES$$b27 / 71 = 0.38$$c2019$$dQ2$$eT2
000078168 593__ $$aMultidisciplinary$$c2019$$dQ1
000078168 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000078168 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0003-0785-4132$$aIbarz, E.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000078168 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-7944-9625$$aGracia, L.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000078168 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-7516-4737$$aMateo, J.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000078168 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-8643-7558$$aHerrera, A.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000078168 7102_ $$11004$$2830$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Cirugía,Ginecol.Obstetr.$$cÁrea Traumatología y Ortopedia
000078168 7102_ $$15004$$2605$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Ingeniería Mecánica$$cÁrea Mec.Med.Cont. y Teor.Est.
000078168 773__ $$g14, 2 (2019), e0212000[16 pp]$$pPLoS One$$tPLoS ONE$$x1932-6203
000078168 8564_ $$s527073$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/78168/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000078168 8564_ $$s104962$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/78168/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000078168 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:78168$$particulos$$pdriver
000078168 951__ $$a2020-07-16-08:56:17
000078168 980__ $$aARTICLE