000078190 001__ 78190
000078190 005__ 20200716101526.0
000078190 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1111/jvim.15438
000078190 0248_ $$2sideral$$a110694
000078190 037__ $$aART-2019-110694
000078190 041__ $$aeng
000078190 100__ $$aCorda, A.
000078190 245__ $$aUse of 2-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography to assess left ventricular systolic function in dogs with systemic inflammatory response syndrome
000078190 260__ $$c2019
000078190 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000078190 5203_ $$aBackground: Early identification of systolic dysfunction in dogs with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) potentially could improve the outcome and decrease mortality.
Objective: To compare 2-dimensional speckle tracking (2D-STE) with 2-dimensional (2D) and M-mode echocardiography in the evaluation of systolic function in SIRS dogs.
Animals: Seventeen SIRS and 17 healthy dogs.
Methods: Prospective observational case-control study. Each dog underwent physical examination, conventional echocardiography, 2D-STE, and C-reactive protein measurement.
Results: Dogs with SIRS had lower 2D-STE ejection fraction (X4D-EF; 44 ± 8 versus 53 ± 8; P =.003), endocardial global longitudinal strain (ENDO-G-Long-St; -14.6 ± 3.2 versus -18.5 ± 4.1; P =.003), and normalized left ventricular diameter in diastole (1.38 ± 0.25 versus 1.54 ± 0.17; P =.04) and systole (0.85 ± 0.18 versus 0.97 ± 0.11; P =.03) as compared to healthy dogs. Simpson method of disks (SMOD) right parasternal EF (55 ± 9 versus 60 ± 6; P =.07) and end systolic volume index (ESVI; 23 ± 10 versus 21 ± 6; P =.61), SMOD left apical EF (59 ± 9 versus 59 ± 6; P =.87) and ESVI (20 ± 8 versus 22 ± 6; P =.25), fractional shortening (FS; 34 ± 5 versus 33 ± 4; P =.39), M-mode EF (64 ± 7 versus 62 ± 5; P =.35), and ESVI (23 ± 11 versus 30 ± 9; P =.06) were not significantly different between SIRS and control group, respectively.
Conclusion and Clinical Importance: Speckle tracking X4D-EF and ENDO-G-Long-St are more sensitive than 2D and M-Mode FS, EF, and ESVI in detecting systolic impairment in dogs with SIRS.
000078190 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby-nc-nd$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
000078190 590__ $$a2.194$$b2019
000078190 591__ $$aVETERINARY SCIENCES$$b20 / 142 = 0.141$$c2019$$dQ1$$eT1
000078190 592__ $$a1.211$$b2019
000078190 593__ $$aVeterinary (miscellaneous)$$c2019$$dQ1
000078190 593__ $$aMedicine (miscellaneous)$$c2019$$dQ1
000078190 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000078190 700__ $$aPinna Parpaglia, M.L.
000078190 700__ $$aSotgiu, G.
000078190 700__ $$aZobba, R.
000078190 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-5504-1393$$aGomez Ochoa, P.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000078190 700__ $$aPrieto Ramos, J.
000078190 700__ $$aFrench, A.
000078190 7102_ $$11009$$2617$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Patología Animal$$cÁrea Medicina y Cirugía Animal
000078190 773__ $$g33, 2 (2019), 423-431$$pJ. vet. intern. med.$$tJournal of veterinary internal medicine$$x0891-6640
000078190 8564_ $$s288760$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/78190/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000078190 8564_ $$s101461$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/78190/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000078190 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:78190$$particulos$$pdriver
000078190 951__ $$a2020-07-16-09:30:19
000078190 980__ $$aARTICLE