000078948 001__ 78948
000078948 005__ 20220215103549.0
000078948 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.5860/crl.80.2.215
000078948 0248_ $$2sideral$$a111325
000078948 037__ $$aART-2019-111325
000078948 041__ $$aeng
000078948 100__ $$aPinto, M.
000078948 245__ $$aSelf-learning of Information Literacy Competencies in Higher Education: The Perspective of Social Sciences Students
000078948 260__ $$c2019
000078948 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000078948 5203_ $$aPreference for autonomous versus directed learning for the acquisition of information competencies (ICs) was analyzed among undergraduate social science students according to gender, degree program, belief in importance, and self-efficacy. Data were gathered using the IL-HUMASS (Information Literacy Humanities Social Sciences) online survey from students at five public Spanish universities enrolled in audiovisual communication, education, information science, pedagogy, journalism, psychology, social work, and tourism undergraduate programs during the 2013-2014 academic year. Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis, and chi-square tests, as well as discriminant analysis, were performed. The results revealed a higher preference for the directed learning style in the four IL competency categories: searching, evaluation, processing, and communication-dissemination. Audiovisual communication, education, and journalism students showed a predilection for autonomous learning, whereas information science and psychology students preferred directed learning. Higher scores in belief in importance correlated with a greater preference for autonomous learning. In contrast, higher levels of self-efficacy were associated with a greater preference for directed learning.
000078948 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO/CSO2016-80147-R
000078948 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby-nc$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/es/
000078948 590__ $$a2.052$$b2019
000078948 591__ $$aINFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE$$b36 / 87 = 0.414$$c2019$$dQ2$$eT2
000078948 592__ $$a1.776$$b2019
000078948 593__ $$aLibrary and Information Sciences$$c2019$$dQ1
000078948 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000078948 700__ $$aFernandez-Pascual, R.
000078948 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-6241-4060$$aGarcía Marco, F.J.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000078948 7102_ $$13011$$2040$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Ciencias Doc. Hª Ciencia$$cÁrea Biblioteconomía y Docum.
000078948 773__ $$g80, 2 (2019), 215-237$$pColl. res. libr.$$tCOLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES$$x0010-0870
000078948 8564_ $$s439349$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/78948/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000078948 8564_ $$s105619$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/78948/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000078948 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:78948$$particulos$$pdriver
000078948 951__ $$a2022-02-15-10:04:50
000078948 980__ $$aARTICLE