000084196 001__ 84196
000084196 005__ 20200117221621.0
000084196 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.jand.2018.07.017
000084196 0248_ $$2sideral$$a109580
000084196 037__ $$aART-2018-109580
000084196 041__ $$aeng
000084196 100__ $$aMurtas, R.
000084196 245__ $$aDoes Providing Assistance to Children and Adolescents Increase Repeatability and Plausibility of Self-Reporting Using a Web-Based Dietary Recall Instrument?
000084196 260__ $$c2018
000084196 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000084196 5203_ $$aBackground: It is important to find ways to minimize errors when children self-report food consumption.
Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate whether assistance given to children completing a self-administered 24-hour dietary recall instrument called SACANA (Self-Administered Child, Adolescent and Adult Nutrition Assessment) increased the repeatability and plausibility of energy intake (EI) estimates.
Participants/setting: The study was conducted between October 2013 and March 2016 in a convenience sample of 395 children, aged 8 to 17 years, from eight European countries participating in the I.Family study.
Design: SACANA was used to recall the previous day's food intake, twice in a day, once with and once without assistance.
Main outcome measures: The difference in EI between the first and second recalls was the main repeatability measure; the ratio of EI to basal metabolic rate was the plausibility measure.
Statistical methods: Generalized linear mixed models, adjusted for sex, age, and body mass index z-score, were used to assess whether assistance during the first vs second recall influenced repeatability and plausibility.
Results: The difference in estimated EI (EI from second recall minus EI from first recall) was significantly lower (P<0.001) in those assisted at first (median=-76 kcal) than those assisted at second recall (median=282 kcal). Modeling showed that EI at assisted first recall was 19% higher (95% CI 1.13 to 1.24) than in assisted second recall. Overall, 60% of recalls had a plausible EI. Modeling to estimate the simultaneous effects of second vs first recall and assistance vs no assistance on plausibility showed that those assisted at first recall had significantly higher odds of a plausible recall than those unassisted (odds ratio 3.64, 95% CI 2.20 to 6.01), with no significant difference in plausibility of second recall compared to the first (odds ratio 1.48, 95% CI 0.92 to 2.35).
Conclusions: When children are assisted at first recall, the plausibility and repeatability of the later unassisted recall improve. This improvement was evident for all ages. A future, adequately powered study is required to investigate the age range for which assistance is advisable.
000084196 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/266044/EU/Determinants of eating behaviour in European children, adolescents and their parents/I.FAMILY
000084196 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby-nc-nd$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
000084196 590__ $$a4.141$$b2018
000084196 591__ $$aNUTRITION & DIETETICS$$b17 / 86 = 0.198$$c2018$$dQ1$$eT1
000084196 592__ $$a1.651$$b2018
000084196 593__ $$aFood Science$$c2018$$dQ1
000084196 593__ $$aNutrition and Dietetics$$c2018$$dQ1
000084196 593__ $$aMedicine (miscellaneous)$$c2018$$dQ1
000084196 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
000084196 700__ $$aKrogh, V.
000084196 700__ $$aIntemann, T.
000084196 700__ $$aLissner, L.
000084196 700__ $$aEiben, G.
000084196 700__ $$aMolnar, D.
000084196 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0003-0454-653X$$aMoreno, L.A.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000084196 700__ $$aSiani, A.
000084196 700__ $$aTornaritis, M.
000084196 700__ $$aVeidebaum, T.
000084196 700__ $$aMazur, A.
000084196 700__ $$aDeren, K.
000084196 700__ $$aWolters, M.
000084196 700__ $$aAhrens, W.
000084196 700__ $$aPala, V.
000084196 7102_ $$11006$$2255$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Fisiatría y Enfermería$$cÁrea Enfermería
000084196 773__ $$g118, 12 (2018), 2324-2330$$pJournal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics$$tJournal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics$$x2212-2672
000084196 8564_ $$s196337$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/84196/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yPostprint
000084196 8564_ $$s103474$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/84196/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yPostprint
000084196 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:84196$$particulos$$pdriver
000084196 951__ $$a2020-01-17-21:54:10
000084196 980__ $$aARTICLE