000086268 001__ 86268
000086268 005__ 20191212092822.0
000086268 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1080/0167482X.2017.1315565
000086268 0248_ $$2sideral$$a99747
000086268 037__ $$aART-2017-99747
000086268 041__ $$aeng
000086268 100__ $$aLorén-Guerrero, L.
000086268 245__ $$aAdapting the revised prenatal coping inventory (NuPCI) for use in a Spanish population
000086268 260__ $$c2017
000086268 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000086268 5203_ $$aObjective: To adapt the Revised Prenatal Coping Inventory (NuPCI) for the evaluation of prenatal stress coping strategies utilised by Spanish women. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed to evaluate the psychometric properties of NuPCI adapted for a Spanish population. Two hundred and sixty one puerperium women completed the NuPCI at the time of discharge after childbirth. Instrument construct validity was evaluated using subscale item correlations. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s a test. Results: Items from each subscale (Preparation, Avoidance and Spiritual – Positive Coping) were significantly correlated with the global result (p¿<¿.001). The internal reliability of the NuPCI demonstrated suitable values for each of the three coping strategies (a¿>¿0.7). The most frequently used coping strategy was Preparation and the least used was Avoidance. Utilisation of the coping strategies with Preparation decreased with increasing parity (p¿=¿.002) and greater prenatal stress was associated with increased use of the Avoidance coping strategy (p¿<¿.001). Conclusions: The NuPCI adapted for Spanish women demonstrates good psychometric properties for evaluating the three types of prenatal stress coping strategies: Preparation, Avoidance and Spiritual – Positive Coping. Results were similar to those presented by the instrument in its English language version.
000086268 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aAll rights reserved$$uhttp://www.europeana.eu/rights/rr-f/
000086268 590__ $$a1.9$$b2017
000086268 591__ $$aOBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY$$b46 / 81 = 0.568$$c2017$$dQ3$$eT2
000086268 591__ $$aPSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL$$b65 / 127 = 0.512$$c2017$$dQ3$$eT2
000086268 591__ $$aPSYCHIATRY$$b91 / 142 = 0.641$$c2017$$dQ3$$eT2
000086268 592__ $$a0.879$$b2017
000086268 593__ $$aClinical Psychology$$c2017$$dQ1
000086268 593__ $$aPsychiatry and Mental Health$$c2017$$dQ2
000086268 593__ $$aReproductive Medicine$$c2017$$dQ2
000086268 593__ $$aObstetrics and Gynecology$$c2017$$dQ2
000086268 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
000086268 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0003-0335-0404$$aGascón-Catalán, A.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000086268 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-3887-258X$$aRomero-Cardiel, M. A.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000086268 7102_ $$11006$$2255$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Fisiatría y Enfermería$$cÁrea Enfermería
000086268 7102_ $$11004$$2645$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Cirugía,Ginecol.Obstetr.$$cÁrea Obstetricia y Ginecología
000086268 773__ $$g39, 2 (2017), 156-163$$pJ. psychosom. obstet. gynaecol.$$tJOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY$$x0167-482X
000086268 8564_ $$s326592$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/86268/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yPostprint
000086268 8564_ $$s63341$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/86268/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yPostprint
000086268 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:86268$$particulos$$pdriver
000086268 951__ $$a2019-12-12-08:53:35
000086268 980__ $$aARTICLE