000087686 001__ 87686
000087686 005__ 20200716101424.0
000087686 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.02.005
000087686 0248_ $$2sideral$$a111190
000087686 037__ $$aART-2019-111190
000087686 041__ $$aeng
000087686 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-3580-5947$$aCollado, S.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000087686 245__ $$aChildren's environmental moral judgments: Variations according to type of victim and exposure to nature
000087686 260__ $$c2019
000087686 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000087686 5203_ $$aIntroduction
Human actions are largely responsible for environmental problems such as global warming (Cook et al., 2013, Evans, 2018). It is therefore increasingly important to understand how individuals develop a sense of environmental morality. Behaving in a pro-environmental way has long been considered a moral issue (Harland et al., 1999, Kaiser et al., 2006, Matthies et al., 2012, Thøgersen, 1996, Thøgersen, 2006). Indeed, some empirical evidence shows that school-aged children reason about environmental issues in moral terms (e.g., Kahn, 1997, Kahn and Friedman, 1995), and children as young as three years of age show moral attitudes towards environmentally harmful actions (Hahn & Garrett, 2017). However, the factors and processes leading to children's moral judgments of actions that harm the environment are still quite unknown. Building upon research based on social domain theory, we expand on previous studies on children's environmental morality by examining two factors that may regulate children's moral judgments of environmentally harmful actions: 1. The target of the action and 2. Children's experiences in nature.
Social domain theory proposes that children's judgments about harmful actions depend on the identity of the victim (Smetana, 2006). The targets of environmentally harmful actions are diverse. Hence we decided it would be valuable to examine whether children's environmental moral judgments would vary depending on the victim of the actions...
000087686 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO/PSI-2013-44939
000087686 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby-nc-nd$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
000087686 590__ $$a3.301$$b2019
000087686 592__ $$a1.818$$b2019
000087686 591__ $$aPSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY$$b22 / 138 = 0.159$$c2019$$dQ1$$eT1
000087686 593__ $$aSocial Psychology$$c2019$$dQ1
000087686 591__ $$aENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES$$b35 / 123 = 0.285$$c2019$$dQ2$$eT1
000087686 593__ $$aApplied Psychology$$c2019$$dQ1
000087686 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
000087686 700__ $$aSorrel, M.A.
000087686 7102_ $$14009$$2740$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Psicología y Sociología$$cÁrea Psicología Social
000087686 773__ $$g62 (2019), 42-48$$pJ. environ. psychol.$$tJOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY$$x0272-4944
000087686 8564_ $$s452258$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/87686/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yPostprint
000087686 8564_ $$s162206$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/87686/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yPostprint
000087686 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:87686$$particulos$$pdriver
000087686 951__ $$a2020-07-16-08:44:02
000087686 980__ $$aARTICLE