000087710 001__ 87710
000087710 005__ 20210902121558.0
000087710 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1080/09593985.2019.1566945
000087710 0248_ $$2sideral$$a110441
000087710 037__ $$aART-2020-110441
000087710 041__ $$aeng
000087710 100__ $$aHerrero-Cortina, Beatriz
000087710 245__ $$aFeasibility of computerized adventitious respiratory sounds to assess the effects of airway clearance techniques in patients with bronchiectasis
000087710 260__ $$c2020
000087710 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000087710 5203_ $$aObjective: To examine the feasibility of adventitious respiratory sound (ARS) as an outcome measure to assess the effects of airway clearance techniques (ACTs) in outpatients with bronchiectasis.
Methods: ARS were registered pre/post four ACTs sessions. Clinical outcomes included: number of crackles (coarse and fine), number of wheezes (monophonic and polyphonic), wheezes occupation rate (%) and sputum quantity. Feasibility outcomes of ARS included: reasons for exclusion, suitability, safety, equipment and time required, magnitude of change after intervention and sample size estimation.
Results: Seven patients (49.7 ± 20.5 years; FEV1 69.3 ± 15.8% predicted) were included. Recordings from four patients were excluded due to excessive environment noise. All ARS measurements were completed without any adverse events. An electronic stethoscope was acquired and the time spent to complete each assessment was 6 ± 3.5 min. The largest changes were observed for number of expiratory coarse crackles [effect size (95%CI) ES = 0.40 (0.01–0.79)], which correlated moderately with sputum quantity (r = 0.56), and inspiratory monophonic wheezes [ES = 0.61 (0.22–1.00)]. The estimated sample size for a full crossover trial was 46.
Conclusions: ARS is feasible to assess the effects of ACTs in patients with bronchiectasis. Expiratory coarse crackles seem to be the most appropriate ARS parameter, but this finding needs to be confirmed in an adequately powered trial.
000087710 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby-nc$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/es/
000087710 590__ $$a2.279$$b2020
000087710 591__ $$aREHABILITATION$$b39 / 68 = 0.574$$c2020$$dQ3$$eT2
000087710 592__ $$a0.496$$b2020
000087710 593__ $$aPhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation$$c2020$$dQ2
000087710 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
000087710 700__ $$aOliveira, Ana
000087710 700__ $$aPolverino, Eva
000087710 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-7876-4735$$aGómez-Trullén, Eva María$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000087710 700__ $$aTorres, Antoni
000087710 700__ $$aMarques, Alda
000087710 7102_ $$11006$$2245$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Fisiatría y Enfermería$$cÁrea Educación Física y Depor.
000087710 773__ $$g36, 11 (2020), 1245-1255$$pPhysiother. theory pract.$$tPhysiotherapy Theory and Practice$$x0959-3985
000087710 8564_ $$s932044$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/87710/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yPostprint
000087710 8564_ $$s107111$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/87710/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yPostprint
000087710 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:87710$$particulos$$pdriver
000087710 951__ $$a2021-09-02-08:33:48
000087710 980__ $$aARTICLE