<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.1080/14763141.2019.1579365</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Lozano-Berges, G.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Clansey, A.C.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Casajús, J.A.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Lake, M.J.</dc:creator><dc:title>Lack of impact moderating movement adaptation when soccer players perform game specific tasks on a third-generation artificial surface without a cushioning underlay</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2021-111267</dc:identifier><dc:description>The objective of this study was to investigate how the inclusion of a cushioning underlay in a third-generation artificial turf (3G) affects player biomechanics during soccer-specific tasks. Twelve soccer players (9 males/3 females; 22.6 ± 2.3 y) participated in this study. Mechanical impact testing of each 3G surface; without (3G-NCU) and with cushioning underlay (3G-CU) were conducted. Impact force characteristics, joint kinematics and joint kinetics variables were calculated on each surface condition during a sprint 90° cut (90CUT), a sprint 180° cut (180CUT), a drop jump (DROP) and a sprint with quick deceleration (STOP). For all tasks, greater peak resultant force, peak knee extensor moment and peak ankle dorsi-flexion moment were found in 3G-NCU than 3G-CU (p &lt; 0.05). During 90CUT and STOP, loading rates were higher in 3G-NCU than 3G-CU (p &lt; 0.05). During 180CUT, higher hip, knee and ankle ranges of motion were found in 3G-NCU (p &lt; 0.05). These findings showed that the inclusion of cushioning underlay in 3G reduces impact loading forces and lower limb joint loading in soccer players across game-specific tasks. Overall, players were not attempting to reduce higher lower limb impact loading associated with a lack of surface cushioning underlay.</dc:description><dc:date>2021</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/88274</dc:source><dc:doi>10.1080/14763141.2019.1579365</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/88274</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:88274</dc:identifier><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MEC/FPU13-02111</dc:relation><dc:identifier.citation>Sports Biomechanics 20, 6 (2021), 665-679</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>All rights reserved</dc:rights><dc:rights>http://www.europeana.eu/rights/rr-f/</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>