<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.1177/0959683620913923</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Bertolin, C.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Domínguez-Castro, F.</dc:creator><dc:title>Reply to the ‘Critical review on the paper: The earliest datable noctilucent cloud observation (Parma, Italy AD 1840)’</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2020-118017</dc:identifier><dc:description>In this reply, the aim of the authors is to correct the calculation errors on solar depression angle and azimuth angle as recognized by Dr. Dalin in his critical review. However, these updated and corrected calculations do not affect the possibility for Antonio Colla of having observed the Noctilucent Cloud (NLC) plausible both in the direction and for the duration he described in his observations. In this reply, the authors offer two different interpretations in this regard.</dc:description><dc:date>2020</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/89655</dc:source><dc:doi>10.1177/0959683620913923</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/89655</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:89655</dc:identifier><dc:identifier.citation>Holocene 30, 8 (2020), 1222-1226</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>by</dc:rights><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>