89665 20240319080945.0 doi 10.3390/ijerph17093170 sideral 117769 ART-2020-117769 eng Gual-Montolio, Patricia How are information and communication technologies supporting routine outcome monitoring and measurement-based care in psychotherapy? A systematic review 2020 Access copy available to the general public Unrestricted Psychotherapy has proven to be effective for a wide range of mental health problems. However, not all patients respond to the treatment as expected (not-on-track patients). Routine outcome monitoring (ROM) and measurement-based care (MBC), which consist of monitoring patients between appointments and using this data to guide the intervention, have been shown to be particularly useful for these not-on-track patients. Traditionally, though, ROM and MBC have been challenging, due to the difficulties associated with repeated monitoring of patients and providing real-time feedback to therapists. The use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) might help reduce these challenges. Therefore, we systematically reviewed evidence regarding the use of ICTs for ROM and MBC in face-to-face psychological interventions for mental health problems. The search included published and unpublished studies indexed in the electronic databases PubMed, PsycINFO, and SCOPUS. Main search terms were variations of the terms "psychological treatment", "progress monitoring or measurement-based care", and "technology". Eighteen studies met eligibility criteria. In these, ICTs were frequently handheld technologies, such as smartphone apps, tablets, or laptops, which were involved in the whole process (assessment and feedback). Overall, the use of technology for ROM and MBC during psychological interventions was feasible and acceptable. In addition, the use of ICTs was found to be effective, particularly for not-on-track patients, which is consistent with similar non-ICT research. Given the heterogeneity of reviewed studies, more research and replication is needed to obtain robust findings with different technological solutions and to facilitate the generalization of findings to different mental health populations. info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess by http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/ 3.39 2020 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH 41 / 175 = 0.234 2020 Q1 T1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES 118 / 273 = 0.432 2020 Q2 T2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH 68 / 202 = 0.337 2020 Q2 T2 0.747 2020 Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 2020 Q2 Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 2020 Q2 Pollution 2020 Q2 info:eu-repo/semantics/review info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Martínez-Borba, Verónica (orcid)0000-0003-2082-8115 Bretón-López, Juana María Osma, Jorge Universidad de Zaragoza (orcid)0000-0002-7293-318X Suso-Ribera, Carlos 4009 680 Universidad de Zaragoza Dpto. Psicología y Sociología Área Person.Eval.Trat.Psicoló. 17, 9 (2020), 3170 [22 pp.] Int. j. environ. res. public health International journal of environmental research and public health 1661-7827 682306 http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/89665/files/texto_completo.pdf Versión publicada 481683 http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/89665/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon icon Versión publicada oai:zaguan.unizar.es:89665 articulos driver 2024-03-18-12:32:46 ARTICLE