000089692 001__ 89692
000089692 005__ 20210902121707.0
000089692 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3390/ani10040732
000089692 0248_ $$2sideral$$a117825
000089692 037__ $$aART-2020-117825
000089692 041__ $$aeng
000089692 100__ $$aOrtolani, Ignacio Rubén
000089692 245__ $$aIn vitro estimation of the effect of grinding on rumen fermentation of fibrous feeds
000089692 260__ $$c2020
000089692 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000089692 5203_ $$aThe fermentation patterns of six fiber sources, soybean hulls (SH), sugarbeet pulp (BP), palm kernel cake (PK), oat hulls (OH), dehydrated alfalfa meal (DA), and barley straw (BS) were evaluated for this study on the effect of their presentation form (non-processed, NP and ground, GR). Substrates were tested in a conventional in vitro batch system, using rumen fluid obtained from ewes fed 0.5 alfalfa hay and 0.5 barley straw. All substrates rendered a higher gas production in GR form (p < 0.05) except for BS but ranked similarly irrespective of the presentation form. Among the substrates, when incubated NP, the highest volume of gas was recorded with BP from 8 h onwards (p < 0.05), whereas OH and BS resulted in the lowest gas volume (p < 0.05). During the first half of the incubation period, methane production was higher in GR than NP (p < 0.05). Among substrates, despite NP or GR, methane production with BP was the highest (p < 0.05). Similarly, the presentation form did not qualitatively affect fermentation, as no differences were observed in volatile fatty acids proportions. The effect of particle size of fibrous substrates does not have a major impact on the rate and extent of the rumen microbial fermentation.
000089692 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/UZ-OTRI/2018-0366
000089692 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
000089692 590__ $$a2.752$$b2020
000089692 591__ $$aVETERINARY SCIENCES$$b19 / 146 = 0.13$$c2020$$dQ1$$eT1
000089692 591__ $$aAGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE$$b13 / 63 = 0.206$$c2020$$dQ1$$eT1
000089692 592__ $$a0.583$$b2020
000089692 593__ $$aVeterinary (miscellaneous)$$c2020$$dQ1
000089692 593__ $$aAnimal Science and Zoology$$c2020$$dQ1
000089692 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000089692 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-8932-4615$$aAmanzougarene, Zahia
000089692 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-0712-1185$$aFondevila, Manuel$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000089692 7102_ $$12008$$2700$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Produc.Animal Cienc.Ali.$$cÁrea Producción Animal
000089692 773__ $$g10, 4 (2020), 732 [13 pp.]$$pAnimals (Basel)$$tAnimals$$x2076-2615
000089692 8564_ $$s519145$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/89692/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000089692 8564_ $$s494924$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/89692/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000089692 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:89692$$particulos$$pdriver
000089692 951__ $$a2021-09-02-09:18:19
000089692 980__ $$aARTICLE