<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2019.09.041</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Tiscareño, Julieta</dc:creator><dc:creator>Albajez García, José Antonio</dc:creator><dc:creator>Santolaria Mazo, Jorge</dc:creator><dc:title>Analysis of different camera calibration methods on a camera-projector measuring system</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2019-118480</dc:identifier><dc:description>The accuracy of metrology equipment formed by a camera-projector pair depends directly on the calibration procedure used. This kind of equipment allows to perform the calibration by two different approaches: as a whole system or separately. The most common approach is the second one: conventional calibration. Studies show that the uncertainty of the camera parameters from its calibration propagates to the projector parameters. The objective of this study is to have a clear comprehension of the relationships between the camera and projector parameters and of how uncertainty is propagated. This will be done by using a camera previously calibrated by Tsai, Zhang or Direct Linear Calibration (DLC) methods, followed by the calibration of the projector using DLC.</dc:description><dc:date>2019</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/94522</dc:source><dc:doi>10.1016/j.promfg.2019.09.041</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/94522</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:94522</dc:identifier><dc:identifier.citation>Procedia Manufacturing 41 (2019), 539-546</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>by-nc-nd</dc:rights><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>