<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.1093/jac/dkz346</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Del Barrio-Tofiño, Ester</dc:creator><dc:creator>Sánchez-Diener, Irina</dc:creator><dc:creator>Zamorano, Laura</dc:creator><dc:creator>Cortes-Lara, Sara</dc:creator><dc:creator>López-Causapé, Carla</dc:creator><dc:creator>Cabot, Gabriel</dc:creator><dc:creator>Bou, Germán</dc:creator><dc:creator>Martínez-Martínez, Luis</dc:creator><dc:creator>Oliver, Antonio</dc:creator><dc:creator>on behalf of the GEMARA-SEIMC/REIPI Pseudomonas study group</dc:creator><dc:creator>Castillo-García, Francisco Javier</dc:creator><dc:creator>Seral, Cristina</dc:creator><dc:title>Association between Pseudomonas aeruginosa O-antigen serotypes, resistance profiles and high-risk clones: results from a Spanish nationwide survey</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2019-115376</dc:identifier><dc:description>Objectives: To evaluate the correlation of O-antigen serotypes with resistance profiles and high-risk clones in a Spanish nationwide survey.
Methods: Up to 30 consecutive healthcare-associated Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were collected during October 2017 from each of 51 hospitals (covering all Spanish regions) with a total of 1445 isolates studied. MICs of 13 antipseudomonal agents and MDR/XDR profiles had been previously determined, as well as whole-genome sequences of 185 representative XDR isolates. O-antigen serotypes (O1–O16) were determined by agglutination using serotype-specific antisera (BioRad). The Pseudomonas aeruginosa serotyper (PAst) program was used for in silico serotyping.
Results: The most frequent serotypes were O6 (17.8%), O1 (15.4%) and O11 (13.3%). In contrast, the most frequent serotype among XDR isolates (17.3%) was O4 (34.1%), distantly followed by O11 (15.9%). Within serotypes, XDR phenotypes were more frequent for O12 (60.0%) and O4 (57.3%). The most frequent clone among the XDR isolates was ST175 (40.9%), followed by CC235 (10.7%), ST308 (5.2%) and CC111 (3.6%). Up to 81.6%of XDR ST175 isolates typed O4, whereas 18.4% were non-typeable. O4 genotype was detected in all sequenced (n=55) ST175 isolates. On the other hand, CC235 and ST308 were associated with O11, whereas CC111 was linked to serotype O12.
Conclusions: O4 serotype is linked to the MDR/XDR profile of widespread ST175 (typically only susceptible to colistin, amikacin and the novel combinations ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam) and therefore, after local validation, its detection in the microbiology laboratory might be useful for guiding semi-empirical antipseudomonal therapies and infection control measures in Spanish hospitals.</dc:description><dc:date>2019</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/95035</dc:source><dc:doi>10.1093/jac/dkz346</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/95035</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:95035</dc:identifier><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/ISCIII/PI15-00088</dc:relation><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/ISCIII/PI18-00076</dc:relation><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO-FEDER/ISCIII-REIPI-RD16-0016</dc:relation><dc:identifier.citation>The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy 74, 11 (2019), 3217-3220</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>All rights reserved</dc:rights><dc:rights>http://www.europeana.eu/rights/rr-f/</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>