000095765 001__ 95765 000095765 005__ 20210902121731.0 000095765 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3390/ijerph17186627 000095765 0248_ $$2sideral$$a120202 000095765 037__ $$aART-2020-120202 000095765 041__ $$aeng 000095765 100__ $$aCalonge-Pascual, S. 000095765 245__ $$aDesign and validity of a choice-modeling questionnaire to analyze the feasibility of implementing physical activity on prescription at primary health-care settings 000095765 260__ $$c2020 000095765 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted 000095765 5203_ $$aWorldwide health policies are trying to implement physical activity on prescription (PAP) at healthcare settings. However, there is not a proper methodology to analyze PHC organizational staff factors. This study aims to validate two questionnaires to assess the self-perception of nurses and general practitioners to implement PAP at primary healthcare (PHC) settings. The designed choice-modeling Google-form questionnaire was sent to 11 expert nurses and 11 expert sports medicine physicians. Experts evaluated each question on a 1–5 points Likert-type scale according to their expertise. Aiken’s V coefficient values =0.75 were used to validate separately each question using the Visual Basic-6.0 software. A total of 10 sports medicine physicians and 10 nurses with 28.4 ± 5.1 y and 16.3 ± 11.8 y of PAP experience, respectively, validated the questionnaire. One expert in each group was not considered for offering 3 ± SD answers in =2 questions respect to the mean of the rest of experts. Final Aiken’s V coefficient values were 0.89 (0.77–1.00) for the nurses’ questionnaire and 0.84 (0.77–0.95) for the physicians’ one. The questionnaires designed to assess the PAP self-perception of PHC nurses and physicians were validated. This methodology could be used to analyze PHC organizational staff factors in order to achieve an efficient PAP implementation in other PHC contexts. 000095765 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/ 000095765 590__ $$a3.39$$b2020 000095765 591__ $$aPUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH$$b41 / 176 = 0.233$$c2020$$dQ1$$eT1 000095765 591__ $$aENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES$$b118 / 273 = 0.432$$c2020$$dQ2$$eT2 000095765 591__ $$aPUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH$$b68 / 203 = 0.335$$c2020$$dQ2$$eT2 000095765 592__ $$a0.747$$b2020 000095765 593__ $$aHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis$$c2020$$dQ2 000095765 593__ $$aPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health$$c2020$$dQ2 000095765 593__ $$aPollution$$c2020$$dQ2 000095765 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 000095765 700__ $$aFuentes-Jiménez, F. 000095765 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-7215-6931$$aCasajús Mallén, J.A.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza 000095765 700__ $$aGonzález-Gross, M. 000095765 7102_ $$11006$$2245$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Fisiatría y Enfermería$$cÁrea Educación Física y Depor. 000095765 773__ $$g17, 18 (2020), 6627 [1-12]$$pInt. j. environ. res. public health$$tInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health$$x1661-7827 000095765 8564_ $$s301230$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/95765/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada 000095765 8564_ $$s487116$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/95765/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada 000095765 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:95765$$particulos$$pdriver 000095765 951__ $$a2021-09-02-09:36:00 000095765 980__ $$aARTICLE