<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.3390/ijerph17031081</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Demarzo, M.</dc:creator><dc:creator>García-Campayo, J.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Martínez-Rubio, D.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Pérez-Aranda, A.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Miraglia, J. L.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Hirayama, M. S.</dc:creator><dc:creator>de Salvo, V. M. A.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Cicuto, K.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Favarato, M. L.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Terra, V.</dc:creator><dc:creator>de Oliveira, M. B.</dc:creator><dc:creator>García-Toro, M.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Modrego-Alarcón, M.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Montero-Marín, J.</dc:creator><dc:title>Frenetic, under-challenged, and worn-out burnout subtypes among brazilian primary care personnel: Validation of the Brazilian “burnout clinical subtype questionnaire” (BCSQ-36/BCSQ-12)</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2020-116840</dc:identifier><dc:description>Primary healthcare personnel show high levels of burnout. A new model of burnout has been developed to distinguish three subtypes: frenetic, under-challenged, and worn-out, which are characterized as overwhelmed, under-stimulated, and disengaged at work, respectively. The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the long/short Brazilian versions of the “Burnout Clinical Subtypes Questionnaire” (BCSQ-36/BCSQ-12) among Brazilian primary healthcare staff and its possible associations with other psychological health-related outcomes. An online cross-sectional study conducted among 407 Brazilian primary healthcare personnel was developed. Participants answered a Brazil-specific survey including the BCSQ-36/BCSQ-12, “Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey”, “Utrecht Work Engagement Scale”, “Hospital Anxiety/Depression Scale”, “Positive-Negative Affect Schedule”, and a Visual Analogue Scale of guilt at work. The bifactor was the model with the best fit to the data using the BCSQ-36, which allowed a general factor for each subtype. The three-correlated factors model fit better to the BCSQ-12. Internal consistence was appropriate, and the convergence between the long-short versions was high. The pattern of relationships between the burnout subtypes and the psychological outcomes suggested a progressive deterioration from the frenetic to the under-challenged and worn-out. In sum, the Brazilian BCSQ-36/BCSQ-12 showed appropriate psychometrics to be used in primary healthcare personnel.</dc:description><dc:date>2020</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/95901</dc:source><dc:doi>10.3390/ijerph17031081</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/95901</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:95901</dc:identifier><dc:identifier.citation>International journal of environmental research and public health 17, 3 (2020), 1081 [24 pp]</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>by</dc:rights><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>