<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.renene.2019.11.048</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Pinto Maquilón, Edwin Samir</dc:creator><dc:creator>Serra, Luis M.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Lázaro, Ana</dc:creator><dc:title>Evaluation of methods to select representative days for the optimization of polygeneration systems</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2020-114567</dc:identifier><dc:description>The optimization of polygeneration systems considering hourly periods throughout one year is a computationally demanding task, and, therefore, methods for the selection of representative days are employed to reproduce reasonably the entire year. However, the suitability of a method strongly depends on the variability of the time series involved in the system. This work compares the methods Averaging, k-Medoids and OPT for the selection of representative days by carrying out the optimization of grid-connected and standalone polygeneration systems for a building in two different locations. The suitability of the representative days obtained with each method were assessed regarding the optimization of the polygeneration systems. Sizing errors under 5% were achieved by using 14 representative days, and the computational time, with respect to the entire year data, was reduced from hours to a few seconds. The results demonstrated that the Averaging method is suitable when there is low variability in the time series data; but, when the time series presents high stochastic variability (e.g., consideration of wind energy), the OPT method presented better performance. Also, a new method has been developed for the selection of representative days by combining the k-Medoids and OPT methods, although its implementation requires additional computational effort.</dc:description><dc:date>2020</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/96086</dc:source><dc:doi>10.1016/j.renene.2019.11.048</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/96086</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:96086</dc:identifier><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA/T55-17R</dc:relation><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO/ENE2017-87711-R</dc:relation><dc:identifier.citation>Renewable Energy 151 (2020), 488-502</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>by-nc-nd</dc:rights><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>