000099415 001__ 99415
000099415 005__ 20210226222257.0
000099415 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1007/978-3-030-25872-6_14
000099415 0248_ $$2sideral$$a123015
000099415 037__ $$aART-2019-123015
000099415 041__ $$aeng
000099415 100__ $$aMartínez-Borba, V.
000099415 245__ $$aUsability, acceptability, and feasibility of two technology-based devices for mental health screening in perinatal care: A comparison of web versus app
000099415 260__ $$c2019
000099415 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000099415 5203_ $$aThe use of Information and Communication Technologies (web pages and apps) in mental health has boosted. However, it is unknown which of these two devices can be better in terms of feasibility and acceptability. Our aim is to compare the feasibility, usability, and user satisfaction of two devices (web vs mobile application) of an online program for perinatal depression screening called HappyMom. In total, 348 and 175 perinatal women registered into HappyMom web and app version, respectively. The assessment protocol included different biopsychosocial evaluations (twice during pregnancy and thrice in the postpartum) and a satisfaction questionnaire. Results showed that a higher percentage of women in the web sample (27.3–51.1%) responded to each assessment compared to the app sample (9.1–53.1%). A smaller proportion of women in web sample never responded to any assessments. By contrast, the percentage of women who responded to all assessments was higher in app sample (longitudinal retention sample was 4.6% of web users and 9.1% of app users). In general, high satisfaction was found in both web and app users. Our result showed that online assessment methods are feasible and acceptable by perinatal women. However, dropout rates are a real problem that urge a solution that will be discussed further in the paper. Web and App devices present different advantages and limitations. The choice of one of them must be made taking into account the study’s objective, the sample characteristics, and the dissemination possibilities.
000099415 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aAll rights reserved$$uhttp://www.europeana.eu/rights/rr-f/
000099415 592__ $$a0.151$$b2019
000099415 593__ $$aComputer Networks and Communications$$c2019$$dQ4
000099415 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
000099415 700__ $$aSuso-Ribera, C.
000099415 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-7293-318X$$aOsma, J.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000099415 7102_ $$14009$$2680$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Psicología y Sociología$$cÁrea Person.Eval.Trat.Psicoló.
000099415 773__ $$g288 (2019), 176-189$$pLect. notes Inst. Comput. Sci. Soc. Inform. Telecommun. Eng.$$tLecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering$$x1867-8211
000099415 8564_ $$s699809$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/99415/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yPostprint
000099415 8564_ $$s1486987$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/99415/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yPostprint
000099415 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:99415$$particulos$$pdriver
000099415 951__ $$a2021-02-26-20:04:42
000099415 980__ $$aARTICLE