<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.26754/ojs_zarch/zarch.2019133956</dc:identifier><dc:language>mul</dc:language><dc:creator>Monclús Fraga, Javier</dc:creator><dc:creator>Jerez Abajo, Enrique</dc:creator><dc:title>Conversación con Winy Maas. Las huellas de lo efímero</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2019-122638</dc:identifier><dc:description>On the traces of the ephemeral and the legacy of temporary events [Fig.1]. In this new issue of ZARCH we want to delve into the traces of the ephemeral on different scales, from the biggest urban plans (XXL) to the smallest design interventions (XXS), encompassing various examples of medium-scale architecture. Therefore, we will consider not only international events, but also pop-up architecture, temporary structures, ephemeral frameworks for equally ephemeral events (festivals, markets, etc.) and even specific architectural installations (Serpentine pavilions, MoMA’s summer installations, etc.). What do you think about temporary architecture? Do you think it has lessons to offer architects “who are still obsessed with permanence”, as Aaron Betsky says? ...</dc:description><dc:date>2019</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/99466</dc:source><dc:doi>10.26754/ojs_zarch/zarch.2019133956</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/99466</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:99466</dc:identifier><dc:identifier.citation>ZARCH. Journal of interdisciplinary studies in Architecture and Urbanism 13 (2019), 256-265</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>by</dc:rights><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>