000099711 001__ 99711
000099711 005__ 20240206150120.0
000099711 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3390/ijerph18041777
000099711 0248_ $$2sideral$$a123210
000099711 037__ $$aART-2021-123210
000099711 041__ $$aeng
000099711 100__ $$aFernández, D.
000099711 245__ $$aCost-effectiveness of two dry needling interventions for plantar heel pain: A secondary analysis of an rct
000099711 260__ $$c2021
000099711 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000099711 5203_ $$aPlantar heel pain is a common cause of foot pain that affects patients’ quality of life and represents a significant cost for the healthcare system. Dry needling and percutaneous needle electrolysis are two minimally invasive treatments that were shown to be effective for the management of plantar heel pain. The aim of our study was to compare these two treatments in terms of health and economic consequences based on the results of a published randomized controlled trial. For this, we evaluated the costs from the point of view of the hospital and we carried out a cost-effectiveness study using quality of life as the main variable according to the Eq-5D-5L questionnaire. The cost of the complete treatment with dry needling (DN) was €178.86, while the percutaneous needle electrolysis (PNE) was €200.90. The quality of life of patients improved and was translated into +0.615 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for DN and +0.669 for PNE. PNE presented an average incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €411.34/QALY against DN. These results indicate that PNE had a better cost-effectiveness ratio for the treatment of plantar heel pain than DN.
000099711 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
000099711 590__ $$a4.614$$b2021
000099711 592__ $$a0.814$$b2021
000099711 594__ $$a4.5$$b2021
000099711 591__ $$aPUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH$$b45 / 182 = 0.247$$c2021$$dQ1$$eT1
000099711 593__ $$aPollution$$c2021$$dQ1
000099711 591__ $$aENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES$$b100 / 279 = 0.358$$c2021$$dQ2$$eT2
000099711 593__ $$aHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis$$c2021$$dQ1
000099711 591__ $$aPUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH$$b71 / 210 = 0.338$$c2021$$dQ2$$eT2
000099711 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000099711 700__ $$aAl-Boloushi, Z.
000099711 700__ $$aBellosta-López, P.
000099711 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-9201-0120$$aHerrero, P.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000099711 700__ $$aGómez, M.
000099711 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-1674-7788$$aCalvo, S.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000099711 7102_ $$11006$$2413$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Fisiatría y Enfermería$$cÁrea Fisioterapia
000099711 773__ $$g18, 4 (2021), 1777 [9 pp]$$pInt. j. environ. res. public health$$tInternational journal of environmental research and public health$$x1661-7827
000099711 8564_ $$s511522$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/99711/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000099711 8564_ $$s2723830$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/99711/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000099711 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:99711$$particulos$$pdriver
000099711 951__ $$a2024-02-06-14:56:22
000099711 980__ $$aARTICLE