<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.1080/14737167.2021.1880324</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Taxonera, Carlos</dc:creator><dc:creator>de Andrés-Nogales, Fernando</dc:creator><dc:creator>García-López, Santiago</dc:creator><dc:creator>Sánchez-Guerrero, Amelia</dc:creator><dc:creator>Menchén, Belén</dc:creator><dc:creator>Peral, Carmen</dc:creator><dc:creator>Cábez, Ana</dc:creator><dc:creator>Gómez, Susana</dc:creator><dc:creator>López-Ibáñez de Aldecoa, Alejandra</dc:creator><dc:creator>Casado, Miguel Ángel</dc:creator><dc:creator>Menchén, Luis</dc:creator><dc:title>Cost-effectiveness analysis of using innovative therapies for the management of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis in Spain</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2022-122932</dc:identifier><dc:description>Background: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tofacitinib in comparison to vedolizumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) after failure or intolerance to conventional therapy (bio-naive) or first-line biologic treatment (bio-experienced), from the Spanish National Health System (NHS) perspective.
Methods: A lifetime Markov model with eight-week cycles was developed including five health states: remission, response, active UC, remission after surgery, and death. Response and remission probabilities (for induction and maintenance periods) were obtained from a multinomial network meta-analysis. Drug acquisition – biosimilar prices included – (ex-factory price with mandatory deductions), adminis- tration, surgery, patient management, and adverse event management costs (€, year 2019) were considered. A 3% discount rate (cost/outcomes) was applied. Probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were conducted.
Results: Tofacitinib was dominant versus vedolizumab (both in bio-naive and bio-experienced patients) entailing total cost savings of €23,816 (bio-naïve) and €11,438 (bio-experienced). Differences in quality- adjusted life-year (QALY) were smaller than 0.1 for both populations. PSA results showed that tofacitinib has a high probability of being cost-effective (bio-naïve: 82.5%; bio-experienced: 90.6%) versus vedolizumab.
Conclusions: From the Spanish NHS perspective, tofacitinib could be a dominant treatment (less costly and more effective) in comparison to vedolizumab, with relevant cost savings and similar QALY gains.</dc:description><dc:date>2022</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/99767</dc:source><dc:doi>10.1080/14737167.2021.1880324</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/99767</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:99767</dc:identifier><dc:identifier.citation>Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research 22, 1 (2022), 73-83</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>by-nc-nd</dc:rights><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>