<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.artd.2020.11.022</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Gómez-Vallejo, J.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Roces-García, J.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Moreta, J.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Donaire-Hoyas, D.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Gayoso, Ó.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Marqués-López, F.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Albareda, J.</dc:creator><dc:title>Biomechanical Behavior of an Hydroxyapatite-Coated Traditional Hip Stem and a Short One of Similar Design: Comparative Study Using Finite Element Analysis</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2021-123251</dc:identifier><dc:description>Background: The objective is to compare, by the means of finite elements analysis, the biomechanical behavior of a conventional stem of proven performance with a short stem based on the same fixation principles. 
Methods: A 3D femur was modeled from CT scan data, and real bone density measures were incorporated into it. Load stresses were applied to that bone in 3 different scenarios: without prosthesis, with the conventional stem, and with the short stem. Different bone loading patterns were compared by Gruen''s zones both visually and statistically using Welch''s test. 
Results: The implantation of a stem generates a certain degree of stress shielding in the surrounding bone, but the pattern of the change is very similar in the compared stem models. Although there is statistical significance (P &lt; 0.01) in the mean stress variation in most of the Gruen''s zones, the magnitude of the difference is always under 2 MPa (range: 0.01 – 1.74 MPa). 
Conclusions: The bone loading patterns of the traditional stem and the short stem are very similar. Although there is no evidence of a link between biomechanics and clinical outcomes, our results may suggest that theoretical advantages of short stems can be exploited without the fear of altering bone loading patterns.</dc:description><dc:date>2021</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/99773</dc:source><dc:doi>10.1016/j.artd.2020.11.022</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/99773</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:99773</dc:identifier><dc:identifier.citation>Arthroplasty Today 7 (2021), 167-176</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>by-nc-nd</dc:rights><dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>