Consumer-brand relationships under the marketing 3.0 paradigm: A literature review
Resumen: Consumer-brand relationships encompass several dimensions, most of which have attracted growing research attention during the last years. Building these relationships is especially important in the marketing 3.0 era, where it is suggested that customers will choose those brands that satisfy their deepest needs. With these ideas in mind, this article provides a review of two key concepts implied in such relationships: brand love and customer engagement. Although both conceptions focus on different stages of consumer-brand relationships, they actually cover different perspectives on the same process. Moreover, they come from diverse conceptual paradigms: whilst brand love comes from the psychology discipline, engagement derives from diverse areas of the marketing field (e.g., the service-dominant logic perspective). However, their further empirical developments have taken place in marketing. Besides, both terms appear to be applied to different empirical perspectives: brand love is usually linked to the Fast Moving Consumer Goods industry and customer engagement to services.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00252
Año: 2017
Publicado en: FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY 8, Art.252 (2017), [4 pp.]
ISSN: 1664-1078

Factor impacto JCR: 2.089 (2017)
Categ. JCR: PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY rank: 39 / 135 = 0.289 (2017) - Q2 - T1
Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 1.043 - Psychology (miscellaneous) (Q1)

Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MEC/ECO2014-59688-R
Tipo y forma: Article (Published version)

Creative Commons You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.


Exportado de SIDERAL (2019-07-09-11:37:29)

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Articles



 Record created 2017-03-21, last modified 2019-07-09


Versión publicada:
 PDF
Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)