Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Groups and Metabolic Syndrome in European Adolescents: The HELENA Study

Iguacel, I. (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Börnhorst, C. ; Michels, N. ; Breidenassel, C. ; Dallongeville, J. ; González-Gross, M. ; Gottrand, F. ; Kafatos, A. ; Karaglani, E. ; Kersting, M. ; de Henauw, S. ; Lambrinou, C.P. ; Mistura, L. ; Molnár, D. ; Nova, E. ; Gunter, M.J. ; de la O Puerta, A. ; Rupérez, A.I. ; Widhalm, K. ; Huybrechts, I. ; Moreno, L.A. (Universidad de Zaragoza)

Resumen: Purpose: Psychosocial stressors derived from socioeconomic disadvantages in adolescents can result in higher risk of metabolic syndrome (MetS). We aimed to examine whether socioeconomic disadvantages were associated with MetS independent of lifestyle and whether there was a dose-response relationship between the number of cumulated socioeconomic disadvantages and risk of MetS.
Methods: This study included 1, 037 European adolescents (aged 12.5–17.5 years). Sociodemographic variables and lifestyle were assessed by self-reported questionnaires. Disadvantaged groups included adolescents with low-educated parents, low family affluence, migrant origin, unemployed parents, and nontraditional families. MetS risk score was calculated as the sum of sex- and age-specific z-scores of waist circumference, blood pressure, lipids, and insulin resistance. Linear mixed-effects models adjusted for sex, age, pubertal status, and lifestyle were used to study the association between social disadvantages and MetS risk score.
Results: Adolescents with low-educated mothers showed a higher MetS score (.54 [.09–.98]; ß estimate and 99% confidence interval) compared to those with high-educated mothers. Adolescents who accumulated more than three disadvantages (.69 [.08–1.31]) or with missing information on disadvantages (.72 [.04–1.40]) had a higher MetS risk score compared to nonsocioeconomically disadvantaged groups. Stronger associations between socioeconomic disadvantages and MetS were found in male than in female adolescents.
Conclusions: Adolescents with low-educated mothers or with more than three socioeconomic disadvantages had a higher MetS risk, independent of lifestyle, potentially due to higher psychosocial stress exposure. Policy makers should focus on improving low-educated familiesa and more disadvantaged families'' knowledge on nutrition and physical activity to help them cope better with stress.

Idioma: Inglés

DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.05.027

Año: 2021

Publicado en: JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH 68, 1 (2021), P146-154
ISSN: 1054-139X

Factor impacto JCR: 7.898 (2021)

Categ. JCR: PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL rank: 4 / 77 = 0.052 (2021) - Q1 - T1
Categ. JCR: PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH rank: 25 / 210 = 0.119 (2021) - Q1 - T1
Categ. JCR: PEDIATRICS rank: 6 / 130 = 0.046 (2021) - Q1 - T1
Categ. JCR: PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH rank: 12 / 182 = 0.066 (2021) - Q1 - T1

Factor impacto CITESCORE: 7.1 -

Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 1.888 - Psychiatry and Mental Health (Q1) - Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (Q1)

Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EUR/FP6/FOOD-CT-2005-007034

Tipo y forma: Artículo (PostPrint)

Área (Departamento): Área Enfermería (Dpto. Fisiatría y Enfermería)