000106673 001__ 106673 000106673 005__ 20240705134134.0 000106673 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3390/jcm10132984 000106673 0248_ $$2sideral$$a124563 000106673 037__ $$aART-2021-124563 000106673 041__ $$aeng 000106673 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-9585-0187$$aSavirón-Cornudella, Ricardo$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza 000106673 245__ $$aPrediction of late-onset small for gestational age and fetal growth restriction by fetal biometry at 35 weeks and impact of ultrasound–delivery interval: comparison of six fetal growth standards 000106673 260__ $$c2021 000106673 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted 000106673 5203_ $$aSmall-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants have been associated with increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes (APOs). In this work, we assess the predictive ability of the ultrasound-estimated percentile weight (EPW) at 35 weeks of gestational age to predict late-onset SGA and APOs, according to six growth standards, and whether the ultrasound–delivery interval influences the detection rate. To this purpose, we analyze a retrospective cohort study of 9585 singleton pregnancies. EPWs at 35 weeks were calculated to the customized Miguel Servet University Hospital (MSUH) and Figueras standards and the non-customized MSUH, Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF), INTERGROWTH-21st, and WHO standards. As results of our analysis, for a 10% false positive rate, the detection rates for SGA ranged between 48.9% with the customized Figueras standard (AUC 0.82) and 60.8% with the non-customized FMF standard (AUC 0.87). Detection rates to predict SGA by ultrasound–delivery interval (1–6 weeks) show higher detection rates as intervals decrease. APOs detection rates ranged from 27.0% with FMF to 7.9% with the Figueras standard. In conclusion, the ability of EPW to predict SGA at 35 weeks is good for all standards, and slightly better for non-customized standards. The APO detection rate is significantly greater for non-customized standards. 000106673 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO/MTM2017-83812-P 000106673 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/ 000106673 590__ $$a4.964$$b2021 000106673 592__ $$a1.04$$b2021 000106673 594__ $$a4.4$$b2021 000106673 591__ $$aMEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL$$b55 / 172 = 0.32$$c2021$$dQ2$$eT1 000106673 593__ $$aMedicine (miscellaneous)$$c2021$$dQ1 000106673 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 000106673 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-3007-302X$$aEsteban, Luis Mariano 000106673 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0003-1415-146X$$aAznar-Gimeno, Rocio 000106673 700__ $$aDieste-Pérez, Peña$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza 000106673 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-2801-416X$$aPérez-López, Faustino R. 000106673 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-0306-8858$$aCampillos, Jose M.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza 000106673 700__ $$aCastán-Larraz, Beatriz 000106673 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-6474-2252$$aSanz, Gerardo$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza 000106673 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0003-4720-8231$$aTajada-Duaso, Mauricio$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza 000106673 7102_ $$12007$$2265$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Métodos Estadísticos$$cÁrea Estadís. Investig. Opera. 000106673 7102_ $$11003$$2027$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Anatom.Histolog.Humanas$$cArea Anatom.Embriol.Humana 000106673 7102_ $$11013$$2645$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Cirugía$$cÁrea Obstetricia y Ginecología 000106673 773__ $$g10, 13 (2021), 2984 [17 pp.]$$pJ. clin.med.$$tJournal of Clinical Medicine$$x2077-0383 000106673 8564_ $$s2327351$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/106673/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada 000106673 8564_ $$s2786050$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/106673/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada 000106673 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:106673$$particulos$$pdriver 000106673 951__ $$a2024-07-05-12:45:04 000106673 980__ $$aARTICLE