000112031 001__ 112031
000112031 005__ 20230519145548.0
000112031 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3390/su13137180
000112031 0248_ $$2sideral$$a127089
000112031 037__ $$aART-2021-127089
000112031 041__ $$aeng
000112031 100__ $$aRymaniak J.
000112031 245__ $$aFrom stationary to remote: Employee risks at pandemic migration of workplaces
000112031 260__ $$c2021
000112031 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000112031 5203_ $$aThe first lockdown due to COVID-19 in the year 2020 created a particular scenario that forced a change to telework among diverse professions and social groups. This article presents the results of research carried out among samples of Polish, Lithuanian and Spanish remote workers concerning working conditions in organizations and at home, and the potential impact of some professional hazards from home-based telework. On the contrary to earlier published papers on pandemic-induced telework that focused on how the limitations at home of first-time remote workers impacted on their well-being and work–family balance, our research contributes to a more recent endeavor that focuses the analysis on the work design perspective. The results of the survey indicate that employees felt more stressed and in conflict at their remote workstations when they had to telework during the lockdown, and that this negative output was significantly related to the deterioration of some working dimensions like space, quality and design but not to the perception of professional hazards from home-based telework. According to our research, the forced situation seemed not to be a favorable factor for implementing changes in light of the insufficient technical and organizational preparation of employers as well as the employees’ mental preparation. It should be necessary to update sequentially the results of the epidemic-induced telework and conduct research for various stages of the pandemic and the subsequent economic recovery. This could help popularize remote work as one of the tools of the labor market in the future and as a tool for treating labor resources as an element of sustainable development. © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
000112031 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
000112031 590__ $$a3.889$$b2021
000112031 592__ $$a0.664$$b2021
000112031 594__ $$a5.0$$b2021
000112031 591__ $$aENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES$$b57 / 128 = 0.445$$c2021$$dQ2$$eT2
000112031 593__ $$aEnergy Engineering and Power Technology$$c2021$$dQ1
000112031 591__ $$aENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES$$b133 / 279 = 0.477$$c2021$$dQ2$$eT2
000112031 593__ $$aRenewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment$$c2021$$dQ1
000112031 591__ $$aGREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY$$b35 / 47 = 0.745$$c2021$$dQ3$$eT3
000112031 593__ $$aManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law$$c2021$$dQ1
000112031 591__ $$aGREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY$$b7 / 9 = 0.778$$c2021$$dQ4$$eT3
000112031 593__ $$aGeography, Planning and Development$$c2021$$dQ1
000112031 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000112031 700__ $$aLis K.
000112031 700__ $$aDavidaviciene V.
000112031 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0003-3772-8591$$aPérez-Pérez M.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000112031 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-6602-8901$$aMartínez-Sánchez Á.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000112031 7102_ $$14012$$2650$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Direcc.Organiza.Empresas$$cÁrea Organización de Empresas
000112031 773__ $$g13, 13 (2021), 13137180 [25 pp]$$pSustainability (Basel)$$tSustainability (Switzerland)$$x2071-1050
000112031 8564_ $$s1857468$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/112031/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000112031 8564_ $$s2615814$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/112031/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000112031 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:112031$$particulos$$pdriver
000112031 951__ $$a2023-05-18-15:47:29
000112031 980__ $$aARTICLE