Social identity, perceived emotional synchrony, creativity, social representations, and participation in social movements: the case of the 2019 chilean populist protests
Resumen: This paper analyzes the socio-cognitive and emotional processes related to collective action in the context of the 2019 populist social movement in Chile. It proposes an integrative explanation of populism as social movements and collective gatherings along with their relation with creativity and social representations of mass movements. A comprehensive online survey was used (n = 262) that included measures of participation in demonstrations, identification with protesters or the government, agreement with social movement grievances, collective efficacy, perceived emotional synchrony, collective action, self-reported cognitive creativity, and individuals’ proposals for improvement of society and ideas associated with stimuli (e.g., the concepts of majority or minority). Our results revealed that identification with demonstrators, agreement with protesters’ grievances, a high perceived emotional synchrony or collective effervescence, and higher creativity responses were associated with an active participation in the social movement. Higher participation and factors conducive to participation were associated with lexical clusters of responses to stimuli that include words such as rights, justice, injustice, bravery, dignity, or hope, which were conceived of as positive social representations of the populist social movement. These findings are discussed within the neo-Durkheimian framework of collective gatherings and the perspective of populism as a social movement that seeks to renew and expand democracy. Copyright © 2021 Castro-Abril, Da Costa, Navarro-Carrillo, Caicedo-Moreno, Gracia-Leiva, Bouchat, Cordero, Méndez and Paez.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.764434
Año: 2021
Publicado en: Frontiers in Psychology 12 (2021), 764434 [15 pp]
ISSN: 1664-1078

Factor impacto JCR: 4.232 (2021)
Categ. JCR: PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY rank: 35 / 147 = 0.238 (2021) - Q1 - T1
Factor impacto CITESCORE: 4.0 - Psychology (Q2)

Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 0.873 - Psychology (miscellaneous) (Q1)

Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO/PID2020-115738GB-I00
Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO/PRE2018-083265
Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO/PSI2017-84145-P
Tipo y forma: Article (Published version)
Área (Departamento): Área Metod.Ciencias Comportam. (Dpto. Psicología y Sociología)

Creative Commons You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.


Exportado de SIDERAL (2023-05-18-15:52:14)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Articles > Artículos por área > Metod. de las Ciencias del Comportamiento



 Record created 2022-06-17, last modified 2023-05-19


Versión publicada:
 PDF
Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)