Effects of different hydration supports on stride kinematics, comfort, and impact accelerations during running

Machado, Álvaro S. ; Priego-Quesada, Jose Ignacio ; Jimenez-Perez, Irene ; Gil-Calvo, Marina (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Carpes, Felipe P. ; Perez-Soriano, Pedro

Resumen: Background: Different supports for hydration can influence total body mass and affect running biomechanics. Research question: Do different hydration supports affect the perceived exertion and comfort, stride kinematics, and impact accelerations during running?. Methods: This was a crossover study design. Thirteen trail runners completed a treadmill running test divided into four different durations and randomized hydration supports conditions, lasting 8 min each at moderate intensity: A) waist bag (0.84 kg); B) medium load backpack (0.84 kg); C) full load backpack (3.40 kg); and D) a control condition without water support. Impact accelerations were measured for 30 s in 4, 6, and 8 min. The rate of perceived exertion and heart rate were registered on minutes 4 and 8. At the last minute of each condition, comfort perception was registered. Results and significance: No condition affected the stride kinematics. Full load backpack condition reduced head acceleration peak (−0.21 g; p = 0.04; ES=0.4) and head acceleration magnitude (−0.23 g; p = 0.03; ES=0.4), and increased shock attenuation (3.08 g; p = 0.04; ES=0.3). It also elicited higher perceived exertion (p < 0.05; ES>0.8) being considered heavier (p < 0.01; ES > 1.1). The waist bag condition was more comfortable in terms of noise (p = 0.006; ES=1.3) and humidity/heat (p = 0.001; ES=0.8). The waist bag was the most comfortable support. On the other hand, the full backpack elicited lower comfort and was the only generating compensatory adjustments. These results may help to improve design of full load backpack aiming at comfort for runners.

Idioma: Inglés

DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.07.234

Año: 2022

Publicado en: GAIT & POSTURE 97 (2022), 115-121
ISSN: 0966-6362

Factor impacto JCR: 2.4 (2022)

Categ. JCR: ORTHOPEDICS rank: 40 / 86 = 0.465 (2022) - Q2 - T2
Categ. JCR: SPORT SCIENCES rank: 45 / 87 = 0.517 (2022) - Q3 - T2
Categ. JCR: NEUROSCIENCES rank: 206 / 272 = 0.757 (2022) - Q4 - T3

Factor impacto CITESCORE: 4.8 - Medicine (Q2) - Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (Q3)

Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 0.779 - Rehabilitation (Q1) - Sports Science (Q2) - Biophysics (Q2) - Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (Q2)

Tipo y forma: Article (Published version)

Área (Departamento): Área Educación Física y Depor. (Dpto. Fisiatría y Enfermería)