A comparison between the effect of systemic and coated drug delivery in osteoporotic bone after dental implantation
Resumen: The increased life expectancy has boomed the demand of dental implants in the elderly. As a consequence, considering the effect of poorer bone quality, due to aging or associated diseases such as osteoporosis, on the success of dental restoration is becoming increasingly important. Bisphosphonates are one of the most used drugs to overcome the effect of osteoporosis as they increase bone density. Bisphosphonates modify the physiological bone remodeling process by adhering to the bone surface, reducing the activity of osteoclasts. This study aims at comparing the effect on bone remodeling of two drug delivery methods of Bisphosphonates: local delivery by coating the implant surface and systemic delivery. A chemo-mechano-biological bone remodeling model validated in a previous paper was used here. The two drug delivery schemes were modeled by means of a finite element approach. In the systemic drug delivery case, the amount of drug that reaches the bone compartment was calculated using a pharmacokinetic model while in the local drug delivery system, the dose was calculated using Fickean diffusion. In particular, the effect of Zoledronate is studied here. The two drug delivery approaches are compared between them and with a control case with no drug. The results show that the use of Bisphosphonates increases the mechanical strength of bone, thus improving the implant fixation along time. Systemic drug delivery affects the entire skeleton, while local drug delivery only affects the area around the dental implant, which reduces the side effects of Bisphosphonates, such as increasing the mineral content, which may promote bone brittleness and microdamage far from the implant. These results support the conclusion that dental implants coated with Bisphosphonates can be a good solution for osteoporotic or low bone density patients without the long-term side effects of systemic drug delivery. © 2022
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2022.103859
Año: 2022
Publicado en: MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS 107 (2022), 103859 [12 pp]
ISSN: 1350-4533

Factor impacto JCR: 2.2 (2022)
Categ. JCR: ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL rank: 71 / 96 = 0.74 (2022) - Q3 - T3
Factor impacto CITESCORE: 4.2 - Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (Q3) - Engineering (Q2)

Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 0.504 - Biophysics (Q3) - Biomedical Engineering (Q3)

Tipo y forma: Artículo (Versión definitiva)
Área (Departamento): Área Mec.Med.Cont. y Teor.Est. (Dpto. Ingeniería Mecánica)

Creative Commons Debe reconocer adecuadamente la autoría, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene el apoyo del licenciador o lo recibe por el uso que hace. No puede utilizar el material para una finalidad comercial. Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, no puede difundir el material modificado.


Exportado de SIDERAL (2024-03-18-14:40:21)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Artículos



 Registro creado el 2022-10-06, última modificación el 2024-03-19


Versión publicada:
 PDF
Valore este documento:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Sin ninguna reseña)