Correlation between PET-CT and ct in the staging after the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
Resumen: Objective: The aim of this study is to find out if a single imaging test is enough to follow-up on an oncological post-treatment patient. In such a case, we would know which was more valuable after comparing the two, by CT or PET-CT. Methods: Between January 2012 and July 2018, we collected data from all patients with previous medical history who were treated with a head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in our hospital, through surgery or by using an organ preservation protocol which we had done. Patients were required to have a CT and a PET-CT performed in a maximum period of 30 days between techniques. We compared the post post-treatment stage given to each case by using only the physical examination (only the CT and the PET-CT), with the ones given by the Tumor Board. After treatment, we analysed the similarity through Cramer''s V statistic test. Results: We performed a comparative analysis, obtaining a correlation of 0.426 between the stages given by the Tumor Board and the one assigned based on physical examination, without imaging techniques. By only using the computed tomography as an imaging method the correlation was 0.565, whereas with only the use of positron emission computed technology, it was estimated at 0.858. When we compared the statistical association between stages using exclusively one of the two imaging techniques, the correlation was 0.451. Conclusion: Independent of the modality, we have demonstrated that in patients who have received previous treatment, there was a higher correlation in the stages with respect to the diagnostic method conducted by the Tumor Board using PET-CT as the sole image. Level of evidence: Level 1. © 2021 Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.11.008
Año: 2021
Publicado en: Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology (2021), 1168 [9 pp]
ISSN: 1808-8694

Factor impacto JCR: 2.474 (2021)
Categ. JCR: OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY rank: 21 / 43 = 0.488 (2021) - Q2 - T2
Factor impacto CITESCORE: 2.6 - Medicine (Q3)

Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 0.443 - Otorhinolaryngology (Q3)

Tipo y forma: Article (Published version)
Área (Departamento): Área Sanidad Animal (Dpto. Patología Animal)
Área (Departamento): Área Otorrinolaringología (Dpto. Cirugía)
Área (Departamento): Area Medicina (Dpto. Medicina, Psiqu. y Derm.)


Creative Commons You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.


Exportado de SIDERAL (2023-05-18-16:08:46)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Articles > Artículos por área > Otorrinolaringología
Articles > Artículos por área > Sanidad Animal
Articles > Artículos por área > Medicina



 Record created 2022-11-15, last modified 2023-05-19


Versión publicada:
 PDF
Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)