Evaluating naturalness and functioning of urban green infrastructure
Resumen: Evaluating the state of urban green infrastructure (UGI) is a basic step to reach urban sustainability. Two indicators were used to evaluate 89 UGI sites in Zaragoza, a medium-sized city in NE Spain: Naturalness (Nat), related to the area covered by natural components; Functioning (Fun), related to the area showing natural hydro-geomorphological features. Complementarily, 15 biophysical and social variables were used to characterize these sites. A principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to group variables and types of UGI, while linear regressions and ANOVAs were applied to identify relationships between UGI characteristics, Nat and Fun.

The Zaragoza UGI was dominated by artificial regular sites. Most sites (73%) have low-medium values of Nat and Fun. They were mostly flat urban parks with very regular forms located in the most densely urbanized zones, and 20% of the sites have high values of Nat and Fun, corresponding to well-conserved natural areas, either unchanged or slightly transformed. Only 3 sites displayed high Nat values and low Fun values. No sites had high Fun values and low Nat values. These groups of UGI sites were mostly distributed along the first axis of the PCA which represented the natural and heterogeneous forms versus regularity and flatness features. The UGI sites scattered throughout the second axis represented a gradient from paved to vegetated sites. Both Nat and Fun were positively correlated with area, natural subsoil and the area covered by vegetation but negatively with artificial soil, regularity and flatness after the linear regressions and ANOVAs.

These results show that Nat and Fun are effective indicators to assess UGI sites. Minimizing regularity of design, preserving the natural topological relief, and restricting the area covered by artificial components are suggested to achieve a balanced representation of ecosystem processes, functions, and services within the UGI network of a city.

Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127825
Año: 2023
Publicado en: URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING 80 (2023), 127825 [13 pp.]
ISSN: 1618-8667

Factor impacto JCR: 6.0 (2023)
Categ. JCR: FORESTRY rank: 2 / 89 = 0.022 (2023) - Q1 - T1
Categ. JCR: URBAN STUDIES rank: 5 / 77 = 0.065 (2023) - Q1 - T1
Categ. JCR: ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES rank: 25 / 182 = 0.137 (2023) - Q1 - T1

Factor impacto CITESCORE: 11.7 - Ecology (Q1) - Soil Science (Q1) - Forestry (Q1)

Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 1.619 - Ecology (Q1) - Soil Science (Q1) - Forestry (Q1)

Tipo y forma: Artículo (Versión definitiva)

Creative Commons Debe reconocer adecuadamente la autoría, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene el apoyo del licenciador o lo recibe por el uso que hace. No puede utilizar el material para una finalidad comercial. Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, no puede difundir el material modificado.


Exportado de SIDERAL (2024-07-31-09:41:27)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Artículos



 Registro creado el 2023-03-13, última modificación el 2024-07-31


Versión publicada:
 PDF
Valore este documento:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Sin ninguna reseña)