Comparison of the Efficacy of Trichoderma and Bacillus Strains and Commercial Biocontrol Products against Grapevine Botryosphaeria Dieback Pathogens
Resumen: Grapevine trunk diseases (GTDs) cause significant yield losses worldwide and limit the lifespan of vineyards. In the last few years, using biological control agents (BCAs) for pruning wound protection has become a promising management strategy for the control of these pathologies. This study aimed to compare the antifungal activities of a grapevine-native Trichoderma harzianum isolate and a high-potential Bacillus velezensis strain against two pathogenic Botryosphaeriaceae species in artificially inoculated, potted, grafted plants under controlled greenhouse conditions, taking three commercial biocontrol products (based on T. atroviride I-1237, T. harzianum T-22, and Bacillus subtilis BS03 strains) as a reference. To reproduce certain field conditions more realistically, inoculation of the protective agents and the pathogens was conducted simultaneously immediately after pruning instead of allowing the BCAs to colonize the wounds before pathogen inoculation. Significant differences in necrosis lengths were detected for both Neofusicoccum parvum- and Diplodia seriata-infected plants, and a remarkable protective effect of Bacillus velezensis BUZ-14 was observed in all cases. Trichoderma-based treatments showed different efficacies against the two pathogenic fungi. While the three tested BCAs resulted in significant reductions in vascular necrosis caused by N. parvum, they did not significantly reduce D. seriata infection compared to the untreated inoculated control. The B. subtilis strain was not effective. The reported results provide support for the potential Bacillus velezensis may have for pruning wound protection against Botryosphaeriaceae fungi, encouraging its evaluation under natural field conditions.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy13020533
Año: 2023
Publicado en: Agronomy (Basel) 13, 2 (2023), 533 [12 pp.]
ISSN: 2073-4395

Factor impacto JCR: 3.3 (2023)
Categ. JCR: AGRONOMY rank: 20 / 126 = 0.159 (2023) - Q1 - T1
Categ. JCR: PLANT SCIENCES rank: 65 / 265 = 0.245 (2023) - Q1 - T1

Factor impacto CITESCORE: 6.2 - Agronomy and Crop Science (Q1)

Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 0.688 - Agronomy and Crop Science (Q1)

Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/CEF/INEA-CEF-ICT-A2018-1837816/EU/High performance computing services for prevention and control of pests in fruit crops/GRAPEVINE
Tipo y forma: Artículo (Versión definitiva)
Área (Departamento): Área Producción Vegetal (Dpto. CC.Agrar.y Medio Natural)
Área (Departamento): Área Botánica (Dpto. CC.Agrar.y Medio Natural)
Área (Departamento): Área Tecnología de Alimentos (Dpto. Produc.Animal Cienc.Ali.)


Creative Commons Debe reconocer adecuadamente la autoría, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene el apoyo del licenciador o lo recibe por el uso que hace.


Exportado de SIDERAL (2024-11-22-12:12:40)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Artículos > Artículos por área > Tecnología de Alimentos
Artículos > Artículos por área > Producción Vegetal
Artículos > Artículos por área > Botánica



 Registro creado el 2023-04-20, última modificación el 2024-11-25


Versión publicada:
 PDF
Valore este documento:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Sin ninguna reseña)