Comparison of Rotterdam and Barcelona magnetic resonance imaging risk calculators for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer

Morote, Juan ; Borque-Fernando, Ángel (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Triquell, Marina ; Campistol, Miriam ; Servian, Pol ; Abascal, José M. ; Planas, Jacques ; Méndez, Olga ; Esteban, Luis M. ; Trilla, Enrique

Resumen: Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based risk calculators (MRI-RCs) individualise the likelihood of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) and improve candidate selection for prostate biopsy beyond the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS). Objective: To compare the Barcelona (BCN) and Rotterdam (ROT) MRI-RCs in an entire population and according to the PI-RADS categories. Design, setting, and participants: A prospective comparison of BCN- and ROT-RC in 946 men with suspected prostate cancer in whom systematic biopsy was performed, as well as target biopsies of PI-RADS ≥3 lesions. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Saved biopsies and undetected csPCa (grade group ≥2) were determined. Results and limitations: The csPCa detection was 40.8%. The median risks of csPCa from BCN- and ROT-RC were, respectively, 67.1% and 25% in men with csPCa, whereas 10.5% and 3% in those without csPCa (p < 0.001). The areas under the curve were 0.856 and 0.844, respectively (p = 0.116). BCN-RC showed a higher net benefit and clinical utility over ROT-RC. Using appropriate thresholds, respectively, 75% and 80% of biopsies were needed to identify 50% of csPCa detected in men with PI-RADS <3, whereas 35% and 21% of biopsies were saved, missing 10% of csPCa detected in men with PI-RADS 3. BCN-RC saved 15% of biopsies, missing 2% of csPCa in men with PI-RADS 4, whereas ROT-RC saved 10%, missing 6%. No RC saved biopsies without missing csPCa in men with PI-RADS 5. Conclusions: ROT-RC provided a lower and narrower range of csPCa probabilities than BCN-RC. BCN-RC showed a net benefit over ROT-RC in the entire population. However, BCN-RC was useful in men with PI-RADS 3 and 4, whereas ROT-RC was useful only in those with PI-RADS 3. No RC seemed to be helpful in men with negative MRI and PI-RADS 5.

Idioma: Inglés

DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.03.013

Año: 2023

Publicado en: European urology open science 53 (2023), 46-54
ISSN: 2666-1691

Factor impacto JCR: 3.2 (2023)

Categ. JCR: UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY rank: 24 / 126 = 0.19 (2023) - Q1 - T1

Factor impacto CITESCORE: 3.4 - Urology (Q2)

Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 0.924 - Urology (Q1)

Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/ISCIII/PI20/01666

Tipo y forma: Article (Published version)

Área (Departamento): Área Urología (Dpto. Cirugía)