Knowledge organisation in institutional repositories: a case study on policies and procedures manuals in the Ibero-American environment
Resumen: The purpose of this study is to analyse the recommendations on knowledge organisation from guidelines, policies and procedure manuals of a sample of institutional repositories and networks within the Latin American area and observe the level of follow-up of international guidelines.
Design/methodology/approach Presented is an exploratory and descriptive study of repositories’ professional documents. This study comprised four steps: definition of convenience sample; development of data codebook; coding of data; and analysis of data and conclusions drawing. The convenience sample includes representative sources at three levels: local institutional repositories, national aggregators and international network and aggregators. The codebook gathers information from the repositories’ sample, such as institutional rules and procedure manuals openly available, or recommendations on the use of controlled vocabularies.
Findings
The results indicate that at the local repository level, the use of controlled vocabularies is not regulated, leaving the choice of terms to the authors’ discretion. It results in a set of unstructured keywords, not standardised terms, mixing subject terms with other authorities on persons, institutions or places. National aggregators do not regulate these issues either and limit to pointing to international guidelines and policies, which simply recommend the use of controlled vocabularies, using URIs to facilitate interoperability.
Originality/value
The originality of this study lies in identifying how the principles of knowledge organisation are effectively applied by institutional repositories, at local, national and international levels.

Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1108/EL-05-2023-0128
Año: 2023
Publicado en: Electronic library 41, 6 (2023), 770-786
ISSN: 0264-0473

Factor impacto JCR: 1.5 (2023)
Categ. JCR: INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE rank: 70 / 161 = 0.435 (2023) - Q2 - T2
Factor impacto CITESCORE: 4.2 - Library and Information Sciences (Q1) - Computer Science Applications (Q2)

Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 0.447 - Library and Information Sciences (Q2) - Computer Science Applications (Q3)

Tipo y forma: Article (PostPrint)
Área (Departamento): Área Biblioteconomía y Docum. (Dpto. Ciencias Doc. Hª Ciencia)

Creative Commons You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. You may not use the material for commercial purposes.


Exportado de SIDERAL (2024-11-22-12:02:13)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Articles



 Record created 2023-07-28, last modified 2024-11-25


Postprint:
 PDF
Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)