Evaluation of the suitability of different calorimetric methods to determine the enthalpy-temperature curve of granular PCM composites

Mazo, Javier ; Delgado, Mónica ; Peñalosa, Conchita ; Dolado, Pablo ; Miranda, Inés ; Lázaro, Ana (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Marín, José María (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Zalba, Belén (Universidad de Zaragoza)

Resumen: The present research has analyzed the complementarity of different measuring methodologies when characterizing the phase changing behaviour of a granular PCM composite (GPCC) through a comparison of their results. Specifically, the enthalpy variation of the GR31 product manufactured by Rubitherm has been measured by using: (1) An energy balance calculation of an air stream flowing through a GPCC packed bed; (2) Differential Scanning Calorimetry; (3) the T-history method. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the suitability of these methods for the enthalpy-temperature curve determination of GPCC. The energy balance setup gave an accurate measurement of the enthalpy variation within a sufficiently high temperature interval. Obtaining a representative sample was not a problem using this method, in contrast to the DSC which requires a greater number of tests to obtain an average value representative of the packed bed. However, the energy balance method does not enable the direct determination of the enthalpy-temperature curve. The T-history methodology allows the enthalpy to be determined based on temperature while the representativeness problem of the DSC is avoided due to the higher sample volume. Nevertheless, the sample must be altered, crushed and subsequently compacted to reduce the effects of the thermal resistances provoked by the void spaces being filled by air. This comparison has shown that there is no single valid methodology for characterizing the phase changing behaviour of PCM granules.

Idioma: Inglés

DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.07.035

Año: 2017

Publicado en: Applied Thermal Engineering 125 (2017), 306-316
ISSN: 1359-4311

Factor impacto JCR: 3.771 (2017)

Categ. JCR: ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL rank: 12 / 128 = 0.094 (2017) - Q1 - T1
Categ. JCR: THERMODYNAMICS rank: 8 / 59 = 0.136 (2017) - Q1 - T1
Categ. JCR: MECHANICS rank: 10 / 134 = 0.075 (2017) - Q1 - T1
Categ. JCR: ENERGY & FUELS rank: 31 / 96 = 0.323 (2017) - Q2 - T1

Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 1.505 - Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (Q1) - Energy Engineering and Power Technology (Q1)

Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MICINN/ENE2014-57262-R
Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MICINN/ENE2011-22722
Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MICINN/ENE2011-28269-C03-01

Tipo y forma: Artículo (PostPrint)

Área (Departamento): Área Máquinas y Motores Térmi. (Dpto. Ingeniería Mecánica)