Resumen: This paper considers an inspection and preventive replacement policy for a one-component protection or cold standby system. Inspection is imperfect, and subject to false positives and negatives; preventive replacement may also be of poor quality. We determine conditions relating to the quality of the inspection and preventive replacement under which a maintained system would not benefit from the execution of inspections and preventive maintenance. We present examples with decreasing failure rate component lifetimes in which preventive replacement is cost-optimal, contrary to the classic policy. Such cases arise when inspections do not necessarily detect the failed state. Idioma: Inglés DOI: 10.1109/TR.2015.2417431 Año: 2015 Publicado en: IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY 64, 2 (2015), 661-672 ISSN: 0018-9529 Factor impacto JCR: 2.287 (2015) Categ. JCR: COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE rank: 6 / 51 = 0.118 (2015) - Q1 - T1 Categ. JCR: ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC rank: 50 / 255 = 0.196 (2015) - Q1 - T1 Categ. JCR: COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING rank: 7 / 105 = 0.067 (2015) - Q1 - T1 Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 1.679 - Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (Q1) - Electrical and Electronic Engineering (Q1)