Graphical tools for helping firefighters in victim rescues. Assessment during a live fire training program
Resumen: This study compares three different methods to communicate the features of a building to firefighters, before starting a victim rescue during a live fire training program. Participants in this study did not previously know the hotel used for developing the activities. The effective number of participants was 144, all professional firefighters. One of the exercises in this training program was thoroughly designed not only for training purposes, but also to test different guide versions. The innovative guides were based on two different technologies (simple stapled sheets of paper and digital content displayed on a tablet) and were developed using several graphical tools (conventional pictures, aerial images captured with drone, 3D models, 360° pictures, etc.). With the intention of facilitating firefighters’ activity during a victim rescue, results obtained using these tools were compared with a conventional communication method. The assessment methodology applied in this study included the use of an anonym questionnaire, as well as the analysis of the videos captured with action cameras, attached with a harness to the chest of two of the four firefighters in every team, during the training activities. Thanks to these videos, it was possible to compare the time required for rescuing the victim and to observe followed paths, visited rooms and substantial information about the tested tools, including valuable participants’ comments. For in emergency situations, the tools described in this paper were preferred to the already existent self-protection plans, usually considered too extensive for fast communication, a matter of special importance in victim rescues.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.01.015
Año: 2019
Publicado en: Safety Science 114 (2019), 105-113
ISSN: 0925-7535

Factor impacto JCR: 4.105 (2019)
Categ. JCR: OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE rank: 16 / 83 = 0.193 (2019) - Q1 - T1
Categ. JCR: ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL rank: 11 / 48 = 0.229 (2019) - Q1 - T1

Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 1.24 - Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (Q1) - Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (Q1) - Safety Research (Q1)

Tipo y forma: Article (PostPrint)
Área (Departamento): Área Expresión Gráfica en Ing. (Dpto. Ingeniería Diseño Fabri.)
Área (Departamento): Área Ing. Procesos Fabricación (Dpto. Ingeniería Diseño Fabri.)


Creative Commons You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. You may not use the material for commercial purposes. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.


Exportado de SIDERAL (2024-01-04-09:05:23)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Articles



 Record created 2024-01-04, last modified 2024-01-04


Postprint:
 PDF
Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)