Decontamination efficiencies of post-consumer high-density polyethylene milk bottles and prioritization of high concern volatile migrants

Su Q.-Z. ; Vera P. (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Salafranca J. (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Nerín C. (Universidad de Zaragoza)

Resumen: High-density polyethylene (HDPE) milk bottles are well-distinguished from other plastics in the mix-collected plastic waste and have potential to be closed-loop recycled. To evaluate this option, volatile substances present in various recycled HDPE (rHDPE) pellets and flakes from postconsumer milk bottles were analysed for similarities between different industrial recycling companies and batches. All substances found were classified in five different levels based on toxicity, from level I to level V (high toxicity). Chemicals present in the samples from different recyclers varied considerably, while those from different batches of a given recycler gave similar results. However, the study of rHDPE stream mixed with high volume of non-milk-bottles provided significant differences between batches. Washing the rHDPE twice and applying extra decontamination techniques reduced to a half the intensities for most chemicals detected, including two toxicity level V substances, butylated hydroxytoluene and diethyl phthalate. Nevertheless, other two high concern compounds, octocrylene, and 2-ethylhexyl-4-methoxycinnamate were not significantly reduced and thus deserve special attention when decontaminating rHDPE and evaluating its feasibility for food contact uses. Extra decontamination was able to reduce the intensities of 1-dodecene and 1-tetradecene. In total, 265 substances were detected in migration tests (95% ethanol and 3% acetic acid) and 58 of them were prioritized by toxicity. Regarding volatile migrants, rHDPE with low content of non-milk-bottle could be safe for direct contact with low-fat content food. For high-fat foods, the main concerns could come from 1-tetradecene, octocrylene, and 2-ethylhexyl-4-methoxycinnamate. © 2021 The Author(s)

Idioma: Inglés

DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105640

Año: 2021

Publicado en: Resources, Conservation and Recycling 171 (2021), 105640 [11 pp]
ISSN: 0921-3449

Factor impacto JCR: 13.716 (2021)

Categ. JCR: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES rank: 12 / 279 = 0.043 (2021) - Q1 - T1
Categ. JCR: ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL rank: 4 / 54 = 0.074 (2021) - Q1 - T1

Factor impacto CITESCORE: 17.9 - Economics, Econometrics and Finance (Q1) - Environmental Science (Q1)

Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 2.589 - Waste Management and Disposal (Q1) - Economics and Econometrics (Q1)

Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA-FEDER/T53-20R
Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MICINN/RTI2018-097805-B-I00

Tipo y forma: Article (Published version)

Área (Departamento): Área Química Analítica (Dpto. Química Analítica)
Área (Departamento): Proy. investigación HVA (Dpto. Química Analítica)