The US-EU Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership: Should It Leave a Door Open for Non-Legal Arbitrators?
Resumen: This article reflects on the suitability of including non-legal arbitrators in certain investment arbitrations. It presents different mechanisms that have been used in the investment arbitration context to aid legal arbitrators with scientific-technical issues and contemplates the drawbacks of this external competence. After analyzing various sectors in which non-legal experts provide internal competence (international inspection boards, specialized national courts, commercial arbitration tribunals, and inter-state arbitration tribunals), the article concludes that incorporating arbitrators with scientific-technical competence into international investment tribunals on an ad casum basis may not be such a far-fetched idea. Finally, various de lege ferenda proposals that would achieve the common goal of not barring non-legal “judges” from the future US-EU investment court are put forward.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1002/crq.21172
Año: 2016
Publicado en: Conflict resolution quarterly 34, 2 (2016), 189-223
ISSN: 1536-5581

Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 0.21 - Psychology (miscellaneous) (Q3) - Law (Q3)

Tipo y forma: Article (Published version)
Área (Departamento): Área Dcho.Internacion. Privado (Dpto. Derecho Privado)
Exportado de SIDERAL (2024-02-05-15:05:54)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
articulos > articulos-por-area > derecho_internacional_privado



 Notice créée le 2024-02-05, modifiée le 2024-02-05


Versión publicada:
 PDF
Évaluer ce document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Pas encore évalué)