Unraveling the multilayer mechanical response of aorta using layer-specific residual stresses and experimental properties
Resumen: To test the capability of the multilayer model, we used previously published layer-specific experimental data relating to the axial pre-stretch, the opening angle, the fiber distribution obtained by polarized light microscopy measurements, and the uniaxial and biaxial response of the porcine descending and abdominal aorta. We fitted the mechanical behavior of each arterial layer using Gasser, Holzapfel and Ogden strain energy function using the dispersion parameter ¿ as phenomenological parameter obtained during the fitting procedure or computed from the experimental fiber distribution. A multilayer finite element model of the whole aorta with the dimensions of the circumferential and longitudinal strips were then built using layer-specific material parameters previously fitted. This model was used to capture the whole aorta response under uniaxial and biaxial stress states and to reproduce the response of the whole aorta to internal pressure. Our results show that a model based on a multilayer structure without residual stresses is unable to render the uniaxial and biaxial mechanical response of the aorta (R2=0.6954 and R2=0.8582 for descending thoracic aorta (DTA) and infrarenal abdominal aorta (IAA), respectively). Only an appropriate multilayer model that includes layer-specific residual stresses can reproduce the response of the whole aorta (R2=0.9787 and R2=0.9636 for DTA and IAA respectively). In addition, a multilayer model without residual stresses produces the same stress distribution as a monolayer model without residual stresses where the maximal value of circumferential and longitudinal stresses appears at the inner radius of the intima. Finally, if layer-specific residual stresses are not available, there is less error the stress distribution using a monolayer model with residual stresses that a multilayer model without residual stresses.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104070
Año: 2021
Publicado en: Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 113 (2021), 104070 [15 pp.]
ISSN: 1751-6161

Factor impacto JCR: 4.042 (2021)
Categ. JCR: ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL rank: 48 / 98 = 0.49 (2021) - Q2 - T2
Categ. JCR: MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS rank: 27 / 45 = 0.6 (2021) - Q3 - T2

Factor impacto CITESCORE: 6.6 - Materials Science (Q1) - Engineering (Q1)

Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 0.746 - Biomedical Engineering (Q2) - Biomaterials (Q2)

Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA-FSE/T24-20R
Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA/LMP121-18
Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MICINN/PID2019-107517RB-I00
Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO/DPI2016-76630-C2-1-R
Tipo y forma: Artículo (PostPrint)
Área (Departamento): Área Expresión Gráfica en Ing. (Dpto. Ingeniería Diseño Fabri.)
Área (Departamento): Área Mec.Med.Cont. y Teor.Est. (Dpto. Ingeniería Mecánica)


Creative Commons Debe reconocer adecuadamente la autoría, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene el apoyo del licenciador o lo recibe por el uso que hace. No puede utilizar el material para una finalidad comercial. Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, no puede difundir el material modificado.


Exportado de SIDERAL (2024-02-12-13:54:48)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Artículos



 Registro creado el 2024-02-12, última modificación el 2024-02-12


Postprint:
 PDF
Valore este documento:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Sin ninguna reseña)