Chromosome-specific induction of micronuclei and chromosomal aberrations by mitomycin C: Involvement of human chromosomes 9, 1 and 16
Resumen: Cytogenetic studies have shown that human chromosomes 1, 9, and 16, with a large heterochromatic region of highly methylated classical satellite DNA, are prone to induction of chromatid breaks and interchanges by mitomycin C (MMC). A couple of studies have indicated that material from chromosome 9, and possibly also from chromosomes 1 and 16, are preferentially micronucleated by MMC. Here, we further examined the chromosome-specific induction of micronuclei (MN; with and without cytochalasin B) and chromosomal aberrations (CAs) by MMC. Cultures of isolated human lymphocytes from two male donors were treated (at 48 h of culture, for 24 h) with MMC (500 ng/ml), and the induced MN were examined by a pancentromeric DNA probe and paint probe for chromosome 9, and by paint probes for chromosomes 1 and 16. MMC increased the total frequency of MN by 6–8-fold but the frequency of chromosome 9 -positive (9+) MN by 29–30-fold and the frequency of chromosome 1 -positive (1+) MN and chromosome 16 -positive (16+) MN by 12–16-fold and 10–17-fold, respectively. After treatment with MMC, 34–47 % of all MN were 9+, 17–20 % 1+, and 3–4 % 16+. The majority (94–96 %) of the 9+ MN contained no centromere and thus harboured acentric fragments. When MMC-induced CAs aberrations were characterized by using the pancentromeric DNA probe and probes for the classical satellite region and long- and short- arm telomeres of chromosome 9, a high proportion of chromosomal breaks (31 %) and interchanges (41 %) concerned chromosome 9. In 83 % of cases, the breakpoint in chromosome 9 was just below the region (9cen-q12) labelled by the classical satellite probe. Our results indicate that MMC specifically induces MN harbouring fragments of chromosome 9, 1, and 16. CAs of chromosome 9 are highly overrepresented in metaphases of MMC-treated lymphocytes. The preferential breakpoint is below the region 9q12.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2024.503753
Año: 2024
Publicado en: MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS 896 (2024), 503753 [9 pp.]
ISSN: 1383-5718

Factor impacto JCR: 2.5 (2024)
Categ. JCR: GENETICS & HEREDITY rank: 95 / 192 = 0.495 (2024) - Q2 - T2
Categ. JCR: TOXICOLOGY rank: 66 / 106 = 0.623 (2024) - Q3 - T2
Categ. JCR: BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY rank: 104 / 177 = 0.588 (2024) - Q3 - T2

Factor impacto CITESCORE: 4.4 - Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (Q3) - Genetics (Q3)

Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 0.668 - Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (Q2) - Genetics (Q3)

Tipo y forma: Article (Published version)
Área (Departamento): Área Genética (Dpto. Anatom.,Embri.Genét.Ani.)

Creative Commons You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.


Exportado de SIDERAL (2026-02-17-20:21:49)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Articles > Artículos por área > Genética



 Record created 2024-04-16, last modified 2026-02-17


Versión publicada:
 PDF
Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)