Fast–slow traits predict competition network structure and its response to resources and enemies
Resumen: Plants interact in complex networks but how network structure depends on resources, natural enemies and species resource‐use strategy remains poorly understood. Here, we quantified competition networks among 18 plants varying in fast–slow strategy, by testing how increased nutrient availability and reduced foliar pathogens affected intra‐ and inter‐specific interactions. Our results show that nitrogen and pathogens altered several aspects of network structure, often in unexpected ways due to fast and slow growing species responding differently. Nitrogen addition increased competition asymmetry in slow growing networks, as expected, but decreased it in fast growing networks. Pathogen reduction made networks more even and less skewed because pathogens targeted weaker competitors. Surprisingly, pathogens and nitrogen dampened each other's effect. Our results show that plant growth strategy is key to understand how competition respond to resources and enemies, a prediction from classic theories which has rarely been tested by linking functional traits to competition networks.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1111/ele.14425
Año: 2024
Publicado en: ECOLOGY LETTERS 27, 4 (2024), el14425 [16 pp.]
ISSN: 1461-023X

Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO/PID2021-127607OB- I00
Tipo y forma: Article (Published version)
Área (Departamento): Área Ecología (Dpto. CC.Agrar.y Medio Natural)

Creative Commons You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. You may not use the material for commercial purposes.


Exportado de SIDERAL (2024-04-24-13:25:51)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Articles > Artículos por área > Ecología



 Record created 2024-04-24, last modified 2024-04-24


Versión publicada:
 PDF
Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)