Toxoplasma gondii in raw and dry-cured ham: The influence of the curing process

Herrero, L. (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Gracia, M. J. (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Pérez-Arquillué, C. (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Lázaro, R. (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Herrera, A. (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Bayarri, S. (Universidad de Zaragoza)
Toxoplasma gondii in raw and dry-cured ham: The influence of the curing process
Resumen: The aim of this work was to analyze Toxoplasma gondii in raw hams by mouse bioassay and to evaluate the effect of curing on the viability of the parasite to assess the risk of infection from eating dry-cured ham. After a serology study of 1200 pigs in Aragón (Spain), forty-one naturally infected pigs with different serological titers against T. gondii were selected. Two cured periods (9 and 12 months) were evaluated as well as the influence of the physicochemical composition of hams on T. gondii survival. Although the parasite burden was low, a high number of seropositive pigs with Toxoplasma tissues cysts in raw hams were found (31.6%). Viability of T. gondii was influenced by the curing, with statistically significant differences between fresh and cured hams (p < 0.001). The viability was higher in hams cured for 9 months compared to those cured for 12 months. However, this period of curing resulted in the reduction but not in a complete elimination of the risk. Thus, from a public health point of view, under the conditions of this study it is safer to consume dry-cured ham with periods of curing higher than 12 months. Analysis of physicochemical results did not identify any variable with significant influence on the presence and viability of T. gondii in cured ham, but loss of viability of T. gondii was observed in hams with a lower fat content. Further research is required to validate combinations of salts concentration and time of curing that can be used as preventive measures in the HACCP system of dry-cured ham industry.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2017.02.010
Año: 2017
Publicado en: FOOD MICROBIOLOGY 65 (2017), 213-220
ISSN: 0740-0020

Factor impacto JCR: 4.09 (2017)
Categ. JCR: BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY rank: 25 / 159 = 0.157 (2017) - Q1 - T1
Categ. JCR: MICROBIOLOGY rank: 29 / 125 = 0.232 (2017) - Q1 - T1
Categ. JCR: FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY rank: 9 / 133 = 0.068 (2017) - Q1 - T1

Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 1.66 - Microbiology (Q1) - Food Science (Q1)

Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO/INNPACTO-IPT-2012-0189-060000
Tipo y forma: Artículo (PostPrint)
Área (Departamento): Área Nutrición Bromatología (Dpto. Produc.Animal Cienc.Ali.)
Área (Departamento): Área Sanidad Animal (Dpto. Patología Animal)


Creative Commons Debe reconocer adecuadamente la autoría, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene el apoyo del licenciador o lo recibe por el uso que hace. No puede utilizar el material para una finalidad comercial. Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, no puede difundir el material modificado.


Exportado de SIDERAL (2024-05-09-13:04:56)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Artículos > Artículos por área > Nutrición y Bromatología
Artículos > Artículos por área > Sanidad Animal



 Registro creado el 2024-05-09, última modificación el 2024-05-09


Postprint:
 PDF
Valore este documento:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Sin ninguna reseña)