Transanal full-thickness excision for rectal neoplasm: is it advisable to leave the defect open?
Gracia, J.A. (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Elia, M. (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Cordoba, E. (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Gonzalo, A. ; Ramirez, J.M. (Universidad de Zaragoza)
Resumen: Purpose
After a full-thickness total wall excision of a rectal tumor, suturing the defect is generally recommended. Recently, due to various contradictory studies, there is a trend to leave the defects open. Therefore, this study aimed to determine whether leaving the defect open is an adequate management strategy compared with suturing it closed based on postoperative outcomes and recurrences.
Methods
A retrospective review of our prospectively maintained database was conducted. Adult patients who underwent transanal surgery for rectal neoplasm in our institution from 1997 to 2019 were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: sutured (group A) or unsutured (group B) rectal defect. The primary outcomes were morbidity (early and late) and recurrence.
Results
In total, 404 (239 men) patients were analyzed, 143 (35.4%) from group A and 261 (64.6%) from group B. No differences were observed in tumor size, distance from the anal verge or operation time. The overall incidence of complications was significantly higher in patients from group B, which nearly double the rate of group A. With a mean follow-up of 58 (range, 12–96) months, seven patients presented with a rectal stricture, all of them from group B.
Conclusions
We acknowledge the occasional impossibility of closing the defect in patients who undergo local excision; however, when it is possible, the present data suggest that there may be advantages to suturing the defect closed.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02745-9
Año: 2023
Publicado en: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 408 (2023), 11 [7 pp.]
ISSN: 1435-2451
Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 0.758 - Surgery (Q1)
Tipo y forma: Article (Published version)
Área (Departamento): Área Cirugía (Dpto. Cirugía)
Exportado de SIDERAL (2024-07-05-12:56:09)
Visitas y descargas
After a full-thickness total wall excision of a rectal tumor, suturing the defect is generally recommended. Recently, due to various contradictory studies, there is a trend to leave the defects open. Therefore, this study aimed to determine whether leaving the defect open is an adequate management strategy compared with suturing it closed based on postoperative outcomes and recurrences.
Methods
A retrospective review of our prospectively maintained database was conducted. Adult patients who underwent transanal surgery for rectal neoplasm in our institution from 1997 to 2019 were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: sutured (group A) or unsutured (group B) rectal defect. The primary outcomes were morbidity (early and late) and recurrence.
Results
In total, 404 (239 men) patients were analyzed, 143 (35.4%) from group A and 261 (64.6%) from group B. No differences were observed in tumor size, distance from the anal verge or operation time. The overall incidence of complications was significantly higher in patients from group B, which nearly double the rate of group A. With a mean follow-up of 58 (range, 12–96) months, seven patients presented with a rectal stricture, all of them from group B.
Conclusions
We acknowledge the occasional impossibility of closing the defect in patients who undergo local excision; however, when it is possible, the present data suggest that there may be advantages to suturing the defect closed.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02745-9
Año: 2023
Publicado en: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 408 (2023), 11 [7 pp.]
ISSN: 1435-2451
Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 0.758 - Surgery (Q1)
Tipo y forma: Article (Published version)
Área (Departamento): Área Cirugía (Dpto. Cirugía)
Exportado de SIDERAL (2024-07-05-12:56:09)
Permalink:
Visitas y descargas
Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
articulos
Notice créée le 2024-05-09, modifiée le 2024-07-05