Resumen: Computational models in hydro-environmental engineering are diverse in their background formulation and span from two-dimensional depth-averaged shallow water models, to complex fully three-dimensional turbulence models resolving large-eddy simulation with surface capturing techniques, and to Lagrangian particle-based methods. This paper presents a first-of-its-kind comparison of six different computational hydraulics fluid dynamics models, namely Iber+, HO-SWM, GBVC, OpenFOAM (RANS), Hydro3D (LES) and DualSPHysics (SPH), in the prediction of mean velocities and free-surface dynamics in two benchmarks involving open-channel flows with symmetric lateral cavities. Results show that shallow-water models capture relatively well the main large-scale coherent structures of the in-cavity flow, with wider shear layers compared to three-dimensional models, and higher velocities in the main channel. Three-dimensional RANS, LES and SPH yield improved predictions of mean velocities compared with experimental data. Computational cost has been quantified for all models with a logarithmic growth when increasing model complexity. The transverse standing wave is captured by most models, with the shallow-water ones matching the theoretical value, while the three-dimensional models overestimate it slightly. Idioma: Inglés DOI: 10.1080/00221686.2024.2401905 Año: 2024 Publicado en: JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH 62, 5 (2024), 441-460 ISSN: 0022-1686 Factor impacto JCR: 1.7 (2024) Categ. JCR: WATER RESOURCES rank: 91 / 131 = 0.695 (2024) - Q3 - T3 Categ. JCR: ENGINEERING, CIVIL rank: 113 / 183 = 0.617 (2024) - Q3 - T2 Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 0.557 - Water Science and Technology (Q2) - Civil and Structural Engineering (Q2)