000146897 001__ 146897
000146897 005__ 20241129141114.0
000146897 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.dss.2021.113670
000146897 0248_ $$2sideral$$a127421
000146897 037__ $$aART-2022-127421
000146897 041__ $$aeng
000146897 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-7914-2623$$aSáenz-Royo, C.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000146897 245__ $$aAuthority and consensus in group decision making with fallible individuals
000146897 260__ $$c2022
000146897 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000146897 5203_ $$aThis paper compares the performance, in terms of expected opportunity loss of mistakes, of group decision making with fallible members, under different organization structures. These structures result from combining the decision mechanisms of authority and consensus with the communication networks of star, tree, and full network. Simulation results from Agent Based Modeling show that the authority (consensus) is preferred when the time to reach a group decision matters (not matters), and in organizational environments of high (low) risk and high (low) prospects of growth. Additionally, the results of the paper recommend that organizations that want to migrate from authority to consensus decision making, as defined here, should switch from the low-density tree like connecting network, common in hierarchical structures, to a high-density full network.
000146897 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA/E22-17R$$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MICINN/MTM2016-77642-C2-2-P$$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO/ECO2013-48496-C4-3-R$$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/UZ/UZCUD2017-SOC-04
000146897 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby-nc-nd$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
000146897 590__ $$a7.5$$b2022
000146897 591__ $$aCOMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE$$b31 / 145 = 0.214$$c2022$$dQ1$$eT1
000146897 591__ $$aOPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE$$b10 / 86 = 0.116$$c2022$$dQ1$$eT1
000146897 591__ $$aCOMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS$$b19 / 158 = 0.12$$c2022$$dQ1$$eT1
000146897 592__ $$a2.076$$b2022
000146897 593__ $$aArts and Humanities (miscellaneous)$$c2022$$dQ1
000146897 593__ $$aDevelopmental and Educational Psychology$$c2022$$dQ1
000146897 593__ $$aManagement Information Systems$$c2022$$dQ1
000146897 593__ $$aInformation Systems and Management$$c2022$$dQ1
000146897 593__ $$aInformation Systems$$c2022$$dQ1
000146897 594__ $$a12.5$$b2022
000146897 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
000146897 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-8405-1056$$aSalas-Fumás, V.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000146897 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-1184-5901$$aLozano-Rojo, Á.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000146897 7102_ $$12006$$2440$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Matemáticas$$cÁrea Geometría y Topología
000146897 7102_ $$14012$$2650$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Direcc.Organiza.Empresas$$cÁrea Organización de Empresas
000146897 773__ $$g153 (2022), 113670 [12 pp.]$$pDecis. support syst.$$tDECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS$$x0167-9236
000146897 8564_ $$s1048754$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/146897/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yPostprint
000146897 8564_ $$s1241942$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/146897/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yPostprint
000146897 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:146897$$particulos$$pdriver
000146897 951__ $$a2024-11-29-13:23:59
000146897 980__ $$aARTICLE