A phase III study comparing preservative-free latanoprost eye drop emulsion with preserved latanoprost in open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension

Baudouin, Christophe ; Stalmans, Ingeborg ; Bourne, Rupert ; Larrosa, Jose Manuel ; Schmickler, Stefanie ; Seleznev, Aleksey ; Oddone, Francesco ; El-Shabrawi, Yosuf ; Garhoefer, Gerhard ; Mossboeck, Georg ; Stalmans, Ingeborg ; Kaljurand, Kuldar ; Noor, Kai ; Jugaste, Tia ; Kaarniranta, Kai ; Baudouin, Christophe ; Santiago, Pierre Yves ; Labetoulle, Marc ; Schweitzer, Cedric ; Vabres, Bertand ; Lorenz, Katrin ; Schuart, Claudia ; Spitzer, Martin ; Hamacher, Thomas ; Schmickler, Stefanie [...] Mostrar todos los autores (66)
A phase III study comparing preservative-free latanoprost eye drop emulsion with preserved latanoprost in open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
Resumen: Background/Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of preservative-free latanoprost eye drop emulsion in reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) versus preserved latanoprost in open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT). Methods: A Phase III non-inferiority study randomised patients with OAG/OHT 1:1 to receive preservative-free latanoprost eye drop emulsion or preserved latanoprost. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in peak (9:00 A.M. ± 1 h) and trough (4:00 P.M. ± 1 h) IOP at Week 12 (non-inferiority margin: 95% confidence interval for treatment difference of ≤1.5 mmHg). Key secondary endpoints were change from baseline in corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) score and in ocular surface disease (OSD) average symptom score at Week 12 (in patients with baseline CFS ≥ 1 or OSD score > 0, respectively). Results: Non-inferiority criteria for IOP-lowering were met. Least square (LS) mean (standard error [SE]) IOP change from baseline with preservative-free latanoprost eye drop emulsion (N = 193) versus preserved latanoprost (N = 193) at Week 12 was −8.8 (0.3) mmHg versus −8.2 (0.3) mmHg at peak (difference: −0.6 mmHg; nominal p = 0.023); −8.6 (0.2) mmHg versus −8.1 (0.3) mmHg at trough (difference: −0.5 mmHg; p = 0.080). LS mean change in CFS (SE) was −0.7 (0.07) with preservative-free latanoprost eye drop emulsion and −0.4 (0.08) with preserved latanoprost (nominal p < 0.001). LS mean change in OSD symptom score was −0.3 (0.1) with preservative-free latanoprost eye drop emulsion and −0.2 (0.1) with preserved latanoprost (nominal p = 0.090). Conclusions: Preservative-free latanoprost eye drop emulsion demonstrated non-inferior IOP-lowering efficacy compared with preserved latanoprost, and improved signs and symptoms of OSD.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1038/s41433-025-03646-z
Año: 2025
Publicado en: Eye (Basingstoke) (2025), [9 pp.]
ISSN: 0950-222X

Tipo y forma: Artículo (Versión definitiva)
Área (Departamento): Área Oftalmología (Dpto. Cirugía)

Creative Commons Debe reconocer adecuadamente la autoría, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene el apoyo del licenciador o lo recibe por el uso que hace.


Exportado de SIDERAL (2025-03-10-12:56:52)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Artículos > Artículos por área > Oftalmología



 Registro creado el 2025-03-10, última modificación el 2025-03-10


Versión publicada:
 PDF
Valore este documento:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Sin ninguna reseña)